As to the May 23rd deadline for AT & Co. to submit admissible evidence to back up the alternative perpetrator,
wonder who she’s proferred as AP? I’m not on any SM, only follow cases on WS and occasionally check out some YouTube videos on cases I follow when time allows but find most to be disappointing with many grifters thinking they’re smarter than the LE task forces investigating the cases. There are some good, respectable ones but I find they are few and far between and not the norm. The vast majority and some of their followers/commenters are a cesspool of lack of logical, critical thinking, don’t understand evidence or how these cases and LE work, proferring misinformation and unfounded ridiculous conspiracy theories galore.
I certainly hope AT is not getting any tips/ideas from any of the SM platform and/or myriad YouTube grifters on the interwebs touting and spouting a bunch of conspiracies and manufactured non-evidence.
I mean take your pick conspiracy- the 2 surviving roommates, a deceased veteran BK, frat brothers, drug dealers/drug cartel hit, LE/prosecutors frame job. I find those who blame DM & BF to be the most disgusting, makes me so mad and sad for these two young ladies’ after all they’ve endured these past few years, and a bunch of moronic grifters blaming and shaming them all over the interwebs SMDH, imo those that spout and engage in blaming/shaming DM & BF are abominable and shameless creatures.
I don’t know if B Kohberger and the deceased veteran BK mentioned upthread knew each other but if they did and had any interactions with each other, I mean the guy is an easy target as he’s no longer here to be able to defend himself, AT might proffer the deceased veteran (RIP) as the alternative perp/killer who somehow got a hold of/stole BK’s knife sheath and wiped it clean of his own DNA but left BK’s DNA on the snap of the sheath and planted it/left it at the scene on purpose to frame BK?? Then how will she explain all the other damning evidence pointing directly to her client BK??? Are they gonna say the alt perp also stole BK’s car and phone and turned off BK’s phone during the murder window???
I mean, if you’re trying to frame someone for a horrific massacre, pretty sure if you had their phone with you, you’d leave it on during the murder window to further implicate them, and will they also claim the alt perp fits DM’s description of the intruder/killer??? And BK never reported his sheath, his car and/or phone stolen???? Or will she say it’s all just coincidence that BK just happened to be driving around at the exact time of the murders, with his phone off? why?? Did he always do that, I doubt it! And the alt perp drives a similar car to BK’s has a similar sheath with BK’s DNA on it and left it at the crime scene to frame BK?? No matter who AT proffers as alternative perpetrator, she still has to deal with all the glaring damning evidence against her client. Maybe she’s going to claim her client BK was there but wasn’t the murderer, was just the driver/along for the ride, or something?? Who knows but I’m over here SMDH over all this cluster&$@&ery.
I realize it’s premature and maybe the deceased veteran isn’t who AT & Co. have already or will be proferring as alternative suspect, let’s just say I wouldn’t be surprised at all if is the case though because the guy’s no longer around to defend himself and easy target to use to plant reasonable doubt, just my own speculation.
At any rate, we’ll know for sure next week if AT submits valid/admissable evidence per Judge’s order but I imagine if she does, the name and evidence will likely remained sealed until trial?? Especially since what happened with the recent Dateline episode leaks upsetting the Judge, I think the alternative suspect’s name and any evidence submitted by AT, if any, will remain sealed until possibly the next hearings in June, that is only IF, if, if, if Judge Hippler allows any of it in.
I guess we’ll see but won’t be holding my breath thinking this is anything more than last ditch effort by AT & Co. to throw more spaghetti at the wall since they’ve tried just about everything else and failed miserably.
Yes I know it’s their job to offer their client a vigorous defense but if they start accusing innocent and/or dead people of being responsible, that’s a bridge too far and I’m glad knowing Judge H runs a tight ship and ain’t gonna let baseless allegations without any valid evidence and admissibility argument to back them up, fly.
IMHOO
