SBM
No, she did not say it directly, though you previously said that this is what she was alleging.
"At least this is what AT is alleging."
In fact she would not even answer the judge's question when he asked her directly.
JMO
The neighbor could be lying. BK could have lied to the neighbor. The neighbor may have misinterpreted what BK said. BK could have used a service for ancestry/traits only and not loaded the kit to a database that produces matches. He may have submitted a kit to ancestry or 23&Me which is not searchable by law enforcement because you can't load the profile developed by Othram on those two sites.
JN said in court that BK "has not asserted factually or through evidence that he was a customer to one of these databases". AT did not rebut that. I'm not sure how a random neighbor's comment that "he had some sort of DNA test" outweighs that, especially to support a theory that actually harms the defense case if true (that no IGG was done).
JMO
I have no doubt they did their own, but this argument doesn't make sense at all. In the eyes of the defense the IGG is the wrongdoing.
JMO
Yes, of course they do. But you said "IMO, if it is a partial STR or SNP, then the would explain why Othram couldn't do IGG." Othram is not working with a partial STR or SNP when they are conducting IGG. They develop a full SNP profile using genome sequencing.
JMO
If they were not able to build out a tree, it's likely because they are new, have a much smaller database to work with, and the profile did not generate enough matches.
JMO