Anthony Defense Questions Whether Evidence Staged

[miimaa]

I don't see how the defense can try to implicate RK in any way. How did he know who KC and Caylee were? How did he get her body? Did he have access to the house to get the blanket, laundry bag, duct tape? How does that explain KCs behavior and lies about a nanny and a job?

IF the defense could show that KC knew RK... maybe I'd buy it
IF the defense could show there was a nanny and she knew RK.... maybe I'd buy it
IF the defense could show KC actually had a job and needed a nanny... maybe I'd buy it
IF the defense could show KC had a reason for lying to LE and taking them to Universal...

and on and on but I don't think they can show any connection between KC, RK, nanny.

 

[Aedrys]

I'm seriously waiting for the defense to say that even mother nature and God conspired against Casey Anthony. They're going to blame everyone and everything they can, no matter how ridiculous it sounds.

 

[LancelotLink]

I don't see how the defense can try to implicate RK in any way. How did he know who KC and Caylee were? How did he get her body? Did he have access to the house to get the blanket, laundry bag, duct tape? How does that explain KCs behavior and lies about a nanny and a job?

IF the defense could show that KC knew RK... maybe I'd buy it
IF the defense could show there was a nanny and she knew RK.... maybe I'd buy it
IF the defense could show KC actually had a job and needed a nanny... maybe I'd buy it
IF the defense could show KC had a reason for lying to LE and taking them to Universal...

and on and on but I don't think they can show any connection between KC, RK, nanny.

Awesome post!!

 

[chefmom]

FWIW, I think the defense is simply trying to "float" ideas right now to see what might actually work at trial, and, if it taints a few more jurors, so be it. You know they jump on here as soon as they throw something out there to see how we react, and I'm sure they monitor other sites as well. That may very well be part of JB's "investigation", seeing how the public, ie "bloggers", are digesting the morsals of bs that he is dispensing. IF JB and CM were to go into trial and imply that RK staged the scene due to his movement, however slight, of the skull, the SA can come back with the fact that the PI that was employed by the A's was in that very area just a month before, slashing trashbags, just like the one that child was dumped in, with a knife and poking and prodding around with a long pole himself. Therefore, if any "staging" were done, who would actually benefit from said staging? The meter reader who knows none of the people involved at this point, but is aware of a missing child report, or the PI of the family of the accused murderer who has tried to trip up the LE investigation from day 32? It will never work. If they try this, they will be helping that needle inch closer to their clients arm. MOO.

 

[Scamperoo]

The scene wasn't staged and no amount of the defense feeding information to it's media cohorts can change that, no matter how many times they say, "Ah, but what if ?".

This little storm they have created leads me to suppose they are rubbing their hands together, gleefully, in the hope that we might uncover other areas they might exploit.

I'm sure they enjoy seeing us rehash and reformulate, however, I'm not about to reinterpret evidence again, for me it was cut and dried, there is no wiggle room for Casey Anthony. Even if Pippy is pro defense and hopes for big ratings from this bombshell/squib, I'm going to their and politely call this one wishful thinking.

 

[logicalgirl]

The scene wasn't staged and no amount of the defense feeding information to it's media cohorts can change that, no matter how many times they say, "Ah, but what if ?".

This little storm they have created leads me to suppose they are rubbing their hands together, gleefully, in the hope that we might uncover other areas they might exploit.

I'm sure they enjoy seeing us rehash and reformulate, however, I'm not about to reinterpret evidence again, for me it was cut and dried, there is no wiggle room for Casey Anthony. Even if Pippy is pro defense and hopes for big ratings from this bombshell/squib, I'm going to their and politely call this one wishful thinking.

Thank you Scamperoo! I love your post and I LOVE love love your "Ignore" icon - it is wonderful and we so need it here for the trial. Where is Beach? Maybe she would be kind enough to add it also to our list! :great:

 

[strawberry]

Oh Lord...talking about RK on HLN now. They're calling the segment "Countdown to Trial." Oh good they say seem to think her location near the house helps the State. And Mike Brooks is on..he won't let them Kronk Kronk.

ETA: They're gearing up! They said only 10 weeks til trial. Prime news will have all the updates until and through then. :HHJP: (I love the txt code for this: hjjp!)

 

[Ssejors]

Tampering: 1) to carry on underhand or improper negotiations (as by bribery) 2) to interfere so as to weaken or change for the worse.

I don't understand how they get the word "tampering" from Roy Kronk's deposition? Now, I know we haven't had a chance to read the deposition, but from the report they had on television, it seems they are using Roy Kronk's statement about poking through Caylee's eyesocket (so sad) as the determining factor in accusing him of tampering? Am I understanding this right?

Like I said in the other thread... there was a lot more tampering done to Caylee's remains by animals, the Florida summer elements, and Dominic Casey than Roy Kronk poking to make sure he knew what he was looking at. A lot worse things happened to Caylee in those 6 months that she layed out in those woods than what Roy Kronk did and I can not believe the defense is STILL going in this direction.

I really do not think that a jury is going to take too kindly to the defense attacking this man. He did the right thing... as far back as August 08! He called LE which is more than anyone can say about Casey Anthony. Yes, it sucks that the responding officer was such a tool, but how does that make Roy Kronk the bad guy? Although I consider Roy Kronk Caylee's hero, but I would never want to be in his position, and not because of what the defense is doing. He found the duct-taped skull of a two-year-old murdered child... it is something that no one should ever have to witness... and he did. He has to live with that picture in his head... not Casey... not Cindy... not George... not Dominic Casey (Thank GOD!)... not Jose Baez or anyone on Casey's defense team. Detectives and Medical Examiners have made it their lifes work to have to witness such horrific images... not meter readers!

Thank you Mr. Kronk for doing the right thing and continuing to keep your eyes open for Caylee... she needed someone like you and I hope that once this trial is over that you can go on to live your in peace. You are a hero!

BRAVO!

INDEED, Mr. Kronk should be considered a hero. Not only did he find Caylee and report what he saw, but he probably lay awake at night, thinking "Should I call them again? Was I wrong? Was my mind playing tricks on me? What did I really see?" No one believed him and in August he wasn't taken seriously and she wasn't found. He lived with that going through his mind until December! TY MR KRONK! For Not Backing Down! For Not giving up on Caylee and For CONTINUING TO CALL THE AUTHORITIES!

 

[Ssejors]

FWIW, I think the defense is simply trying to "float" ideas right now to see what might actually work at trial, and, if it taints a few more jurors, so be it. You know they jump on here as soon as they throw something out there to see how we react, and I'm sure they monitor other sites as well. That may very well be part of JB's "investigation", seeing how the public, ie "bloggers", are digesting the morsals of bs that he is dispensing. IF JB and CM were to go into trial and imply that RK staged the scene due to his movement, however slight, of the skull, the SA can come back with the fact that the PI that was employed by the A's was in that very area just a month before, slashing trashbags, just like the one that child was dumped in, with a knife and poking and prodding around with a long pole himself. Therefore, if any "staging" were done, who would actually benefit from said staging? The meter reader who knows none of the people involved at this point, but is aware of a missing child report, or the PI of the family of the accused murderer who has tried to trip up the LE investigation from day 32? It will never work. If they try this, they will be helping that needle inch closer to their clients arm. MOO.

:rocker::rocker::rocker::rocker::gthanks::cupcake::toast::applause:

And you get a WS Cookie for My Post of the DAY! TY

 

[Cat13067]

Ya know, I just got back from Orlando and I REALLLLYYYY don't think people are fixated on KC. In her dreams, maybe, and that of her defense team. I just did not see it. There are just too many other things going on in Orlando to even care about KC's fate. We see it here because we all feel personally involved. Defense is trying to make the rest of the world think KC can not get a fair trial and keeps spinning, spinning, spinning and I believe the locals have just put the "ignore" button on. It's a city of entertainment and KC is yesterday's news. jmo

You are ao right! We could care less about ICA! All we care about is the money this trial is costing us, and the news that Caylee finally gets to rest in peace.

 

[BD1]

Is the jury going to see the actual photos of that little girl's skull with duct tape attached? I hope they do. A computerized version would be great, but the horror of the real deal would be very valuable to the prosecution.

 

[joypath]

Is the jury going to see the actual photos of that little girl's skull with duct tape attached? I hope they do. A computerized version would be great, but the horror of the real deal would be very valuable to the prosecution.

:twocents: In MOST homicide cases or wrongful death that I'm :innocent: familiar with, the jury DEFINITELY observes the photographs taken by the OCME's tech and those of the autopsy if needed for emphasis regarding the case/death. The SA/prosecution enters them into evidence as numbered exhibits and then the testifying specialists are able to refer to the photographs WITHOUT the general public's COMPLETE awareness of graphic detail. The exhibits are taken into the jury room during deliberations by the jury for further examination as needed.

 

[LambChop]

:twocents: In MOST homicide cases or wrongful death that I'm :innocent: familiar with, the jury DEFINITELY observes the photographs taken by the OCME's tech and those of the autopsy if needed for emphasis regarding the case/death. The SA/prosecution enters them into evidence as numbered exhibits and then the testifying specialists are able to refer to the photographs WITHOUT the general public's COMPLETE awareness of graphic detail. The exhibits are taken into the jury room during deliberations by the jury for further examination as needed.

Does the fact that Dr. Spitz failed to mention Caylee's skull showed signs of sagittal synostosis a significant oversight when doing a report?

 

[celticthyme]

Can you imagine being on that jury and seeing that tiny little skull with duct tape wrapped around it for the first time?? It will affect them, like Kronk, for the rest of their lives. You simply can not look at that and the collection of tiny little bones, and not feel the horror and terror of what that dear child must have endured. There is just no getting around this, and the 31 days. No way, no how. They can try every trick in the book to obfuscate, distract and confuse, but they can't avoid the reality of that child being at the mercy of her sick, selfish mother.

 

[joypath]

Does the fact that Dr. Spitz failed to mention Caylee's skull showed signs of sagittal synostosis a significant oversight when doing a report?

:twocents: Not sure if he had access to an X-ray instrument within the facility where he performed the post OR if the X-rays from OCME were provided OR if he has a "light box" at the funeral home OR a "light box" at his office! :seeya: (Yeah, one CAN hold "pictures" up to the light and get a "preliminary" type reading, per se):floorlaugh:


Is it a significant oversight?.........well, it's definitely something that the SA can utilize to "ahem:innocent:, call his opinion into question":waitasec:!