- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 15,669
- Reaction score
- 105,644
It specifies in the article that it is a medical museum. I imagine most of its collection is medical specimens of some description, including human parts and remains.Body parts. Museum.
Weird attraction--if in fact they were on display.
Okay, that makes more sense. Still weird though.It specifies in the article that it is a medical museum. I imagine most of its collection is medical specimens of some description, including human parts and remains.
MOO
It's not a museum you'd have toddlers running around, it specifies that it's a university museum. Think of it more as an academic collection; it's entirely possible it's only accessed by students and staff.Okay, that makes more sense. Still weird though.
It's the part that says, 'without consent' I find a bit uneasy.It's not a museum you'd have toddlers running around, it specifies that it's a university museum. Think of it more as an academic collection; it's entirely possible it's only accessed by students and staff.
And that's why the museum is reaching out, now. It's not acceptable practice any more. A lot of places are going to be going over their collections and trying to find provenance.It's the part that says, 'without consent' I find a bit uneasy.
Edinburgh has one of these museums and you can pay to go into it. Very interesting if a bit grim in placesThe mid twentieth century a lot of this went on. Henrietta Lacks is probably the one individual whose unconsenting samples made the biggest difference in the history of medicine. It was still unethical.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.