• #21
I just saw this pop up from the NCMEC Facebook page while scrolling! Wow!

Like many here, I have so many questions, but we may never get those answers, which is understandable.
 
  • #22
If a 13 year old romantically eloped and bore their paramour no ill will it would be very understandable that they would not want to reveal the details of their disappearance even 30+ years later.

A 13-year-old can't romantically elope. They are too young to consent. They might be manipulated by an adult into thinking that's what's happening but it's actually a serious crime, no matter how much time has passed, no matter what they believe as an adult.
 
  • #23
I am very glad she's alive and well. Why didn't her case make it into NamUs, is my biggest question.

A 13-year-old disappeared in 1994, and it's said police and her family had no idea what happened, so the case should have remained open and in the national database, in my opinion. (Unless it was there for LE but hidden from the public, which I believe some cases are.). My opinions only
 
  • #24
I have questions also. Not sure how if would effect her privacy knowing why a 13 yo disappears and is reported missing allegedly and there's no namus or mention of searches over time. It's awesome that she is alive but a 13 yo going missing seems to be treated like no big deal
She may have run away from her family and does not want to rehash old wounds. I am so curious as well, but I can also understand why someone might not want to drag old stories out into the light if one has moved on.
 
  • #25
She may have run away from her family and does not want to rehash old wounds. I am so curious as well, but I can also understand why someone might not want to drag old stories out into the light if one has moved on.
At 13 years old, she had to have been taken in by someone who took care of her, hid her from her parents and police, etc. That's criminal behavior. She's a minor. Someone broke the law.
 
  • #26

*****
Capt. Jamie Garrett, who contacted the 44-year-old woman to confirm her identity, said she was surprised to learn that Plante left on purpose, with the assistance of others.

*****
“I guess she wasn’t happy with where she was living and who she was living with, and she ran away,” Garrett told “Jesse Weber Live” on Thursday.

“I was dumbfounded,” the cold case investigator added. “I was like, ‘Oh, my gosh. Okay, so you ran away.’ I told her … ‘You know, we were under the impression that somebody kidnapped you. It was deemed a criminal offense.’”

*****
Garrett said she recently zeroed in on an adult she suspected might be Plante and reached out to them by phone.

Now living under a different name, Plante acknowledged her identity, Garrett said, but offered few details beyond saying she left voluntarily with the aid of family members with whom she had been communicating.

*****
 
  • #27

*****
Capt. Jamie Garrett, who contacted the 44-year-old woman to confirm her identity, said she was surprised to learn that Plante left on purpose, with the assistance of others.

*****
“I guess she wasn’t happy with where she was living and who she was living with, and she ran away,” Garrett told “Jesse Weber Live” on Thursday.

“I was dumbfounded,” the cold case investigator added. “I was like, ‘Oh, my gosh. Okay, so you ran away.’ I told her … ‘You know, we were under the impression that somebody kidnapped you. It was deemed a criminal offense.’”

*****
Garrett said she recently zeroed in on an adult she suspected might be Plante and reached out to them by phone.

Now living under a different name, Plante acknowledged her identity, Garrett said, but offered few details beyond saying she left voluntarily with the aid of family members with whom she had been communicating.

*****
If she got help from family members, maybe it was a custody dispute, or she was trying to escape an abusive situation?
 
  • #28
“I was dumbfounded,” the cold case investigator added. “I was like, ‘Oh, my gosh. Okay, so you ran away.’ I told her … ‘You know, we were under the impression that somebody kidnapped you. It was deemed a criminal offense.’”
Yet she wasn't in namus. How many more cases do we have like this
 
  • #29

*****
Capt. Jamie Garrett, who contacted the 44-year-old woman to confirm her identity, said she was surprised to learn that Plante left on purpose, with the assistance of others.

*****
“I guess she wasn’t happy with where she was living and who she was living with, and she ran away,” Garrett told “Jesse Weber Live” on Thursday.

“I was dumbfounded,” the cold case investigator added. “I was like, ‘Oh, my gosh. Okay, so you ran away.’ I told her … ‘You know, we were under the impression that somebody kidnapped you. It was deemed a criminal offense.’”

*****
Garrett said she recently zeroed in on an adult she suspected might be Plante and reached out to them by phone.

Now living under a different name, Plante acknowledged her identity, Garrett said, but offered few details beyond saying she left voluntarily with the aid of family members with whom she had been communicating.

*****
If that’s the case, it might be ok to conduct a cursory investigation without pressing charges. If there was no inappropriate relationship between the child and the adults who took her in, if the move was voluntary and no coercion or abuse involved, it’s probably ok.
 
  • #30
Yet she wasn't in namus. How many more cases do we have like this
I would be pretty confident to guess hundreds. If small town investigators put in the real, thankless work of methodically entering the details of their missing persons cases into namus, a lot more UIDs would be getting identified.

Some living cases like this one would probably emerge as well - and could be handled much more privately if deemed appropriate by the families and law enforcement. People would Google themselves, see their own namus, contact the agency and get it resolved with no need for any media involvement at all.
 
  • #31
  • #32
At 13 years old, she had to have been taken in by someone who took care of her, hid her from her parents and police, etc. That's criminal behavior. She's a minor. Someone broke the law.
Maybe yes, maybe no.

Let’s say her story is she ran away and lived on the streets til she was 18 and now is doing okay, I’d be hard pressed to investigate and potentially uproot stable lives.

Sure, the police could investigate her adolescence, but without her cooperation, I doubt they’d get anywhere. Rarely, leaving things alone could be the right thing.
 
  • #33
I don't know if others have noticed this, but there aren't any articles in Arizona newspapers on this case dating
back to 1994....only two generic references ( articles or mentions that did not focus solely on her)...one in the Kennebec ( Me ) Journal and the Allentown ( Pa) Morning Call.....both in 1994.
More is being made about this today in 2026 than back when it happened.
 
  • #34
Maybe yes, maybe no.

Let’s say her story is she ran away and lived on the streets til she was 18 and now is doing okay, I’d be hard pressed to investigate and potentially uproot stable lives.

Sure, the police could investigate her adolescence, but without her cooperation, I doubt they’d get anywhere. Rarely, leaving things alone could be the right thing.
They can just start by investigating the pasts of the adult family members she was living with. They already have that information. Criminal background checks, interview friends and family, neighbors, former employers, if needed. Look at school records for the missing girl, using the new name that she took, etc. That should be enough to get an idea of what happened to her after running away and verifying that she was living in a safe environment and not being abused by any adults. If nothing turns up, they can keep the investigation details under a gag order, etc. It's due diligence.

Relatives or not, they did something illegal back then. I'm still remembering the other young girl who "ran away" from home at age 15 and recently turned herself in to police, saying her disappearance was voluntary. Police investigated and found she'd been lured away by a guy contacting her online through a computer game. He was in his 20's at the time of her "running away". She lived in a full partner relationship with him for many years. When police searched their apartment, they found child pornography on the guy's computer. It wasn't a loving "relationship". He was arrested. It sounded like she had grown too "old" for him, so she was going public to get an ID and driver's license so she could get a job. Sounds like he was trying to get rid of her to make room for a younger victim.

Not saying this is the situation in this case, but police should always investigate these situations, just to be sure. Child abusers victimize children all their lives, into old age.
 
Last edited:
  • #35

"
A former Gila County sheriff’s deputy, Terry Hudgens, told NBC News that Plante, who went by Tina, was in a “custody battle” and wanted to live with her mom, not her father.

So the teen met up with her mother while heading to her stable to see her horse back in 1994 and the pair left Arizona on a flight, Hudgens said.

He said they may have even flown “out of the country.”

Plante was found to be safe at the time, Hudgens said, though the sheriff’s office maintains her case was never officially been resolved until recently."

"
In an updated statement on Friday, April 3, Gila Sheriff J. Adam Shepherd said that Plante had been first reported missing by an uncle.

At the time, authorities traced a vehicle suspected to be involved in her disappearance to a nearby hotel and “deputies believed Christina may have been taken by her non-custodial parent, her mother.”

But “that information could not be verified at the time,” according to the new statement."
 
  • #36

"
A former Gila County sheriff’s deputy, Terry Hudgens, told NBC News that Plante, who went by Tina, was in a “custody battle” and wanted to live with her mom, not her father.

So the teen met up with her mother while heading to her stable to see her horse back in 1994 and the pair left Arizona on a flight, Hudgens said.

He said they may have even flown “out of the country.”

Plante was found to be safe at the time, Hudgens said, though the sheriff’s office maintains her case was never officially been resolved until recently."

"
In an updated statement on Friday, April 3, Gila Sheriff J. Adam Shepherd said that Plante had been first reported missing by an uncle.

At the time, authorities traced a vehicle suspected to be involved in her disappearance to a nearby hotel and “deputies believed Christina may have been taken by her non-custodial parent, her mother.”

But “that information could not be verified at the time,” according to the new statement."
On the one hand, I'm really glad to know there wasn't anything criminal going on.
On the other hand, wow, it wasn't even her dad that reported her missing.
No wonder she wanted to live with her mom.
I wish her nothing but the best.
 
  • #37
New reporting overnight.

Terry Hudgens, the Gila County deputy who led the investigation in 1994, said he is mystified the case is making news because Christina's disappearance was resolved shortly after she was reported missing. Christina's father had custody; she wanted to live with her mother. She arranged to meet her mother nearby. The two of them drove to Phoenix and flew out of state. Hudgens said the sheriff's office determined it was a custody issue and the child was safe.

While the current Gila County Chief Deputy Sheriff, James Lahti, confirmed Hudgens's role in the initial investigation, he said the case was never officially closed.

NBC provides information about Christina's living situation back in 1994:

The Payson Roundup, in a May 18, 1994 newspaper article, quoted Hudgens as saying that Plante "had commented to friends about running away. But everybody kind of treats it not too seriously because they don't think she'd ever leave without her horse and her brother," Hudgens reportedly said.

At the time, Plante was living with an aunt and uncle who put up a $10,000 reward for information on her whereabouts. Her name was entered into national databases for missing children and Lahti said investigators would revisit her case periodically as the years passed and the trail grew cold.
 
  • #38
Well I am really glad this wasn't a case of a 13-year-old who actually went missing from her family with little attention. (At least she was with her mother, but you have to wonder why her mother didn't have partial custody. There may or may not have been a good reason.) Hopefully the media will leave her alone. JMO.
 
  • #39
So….

Girl runs away to live with her mom. Her father had custody, but she was living with an aunt and uncle. Custodial parent (father) doesn’t press the issue, but her uncle reports her missing. LE at the time figure out she’s safe and with her mom and don’t press the issue, but also don’t officially close the case. 32 years later, Gila County cold case investigators pick it up and find her. She tells them she left of her own volition and doesn’t think about it anymore. Then, the sheriff’s office puts out a press release saying there had never been any viable leads and commending investigators. Now, a People article has been written and this 44 year old woman’s life has become national news.

Am I getting that right?
 
  • #40
According to the April 1, 2026 press release, details won't be released at this time. I'd like to know if a crime was committed when she disappeared. IMO
Respectfully, I feel like it is not our place to speculate. It sounds like the family wants their privacy and we should respect that. This feels invasive, as well as some other posts on here.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
125
Guests online
9,554
Total visitors
9,679

Forum statistics

Threads
645,752
Messages
18,847,652
Members
245,786
Latest member
JDeF
Top