This case is weighing heavily on me.
How long does it take for forensics to come back? Is it strange that there is no info reported to the public about what they examined in her house?
Also, can they give Ashlee a psychiatric evaluation and potentially admit her for inpatient treatment if she is found to be unstable? It seems like if CPS is called for a wellness check and they find that the parent is unable to care for the child and needs mental health help they would take the parent to the hospital for treatment. I don’t see how this situation is really any different. Police were notified due to concerns from the school, and no child was present and the mother is not saying where she is. How is that not grounds to do a psych eval at the very least? If Ashlee is in fact very sick, getting treatment could potentially save Melodee’s life if she is still alive.
It seems like as a society our job should be to care for our most vulnerable (in this case children) and just letting the mother move about as she pleases with no accountability seems so wrong in my opinion. I’m also feeling very angry that it seems (granted this is me speculating) that Ashlee wasn’t provided more thorough, consistent care over the years given her previous mental health struggles because ultimately it’s the child who is so affected.
Just such a sad situation all around given Ashlee’s traumatic upbringing that has now been passed down to Melodee. JMO
I think it's natural to imagine 'what if' and wish nothing had ever happened.
However, I think there are two separate issues here: crimes and criminal law, and family issues and family law.
IMO, Melodee's case bypassed family law and went straight into the realm of criminal law. That may have been intentional by her mother.
From the criminal law end, investigators aim to prosecute for the actual wrong-doing/felony (kidnapping, assault, manslaughter, etc) and for that they need sufficient evidence, beyond a reasonsble doubt. Whether a key suspect has concocted an elaborate fake story, is just refusing to speak, or has given a true confession or a false confession (they didn't do it but say they did) - IMO that's not the key point. LE always look to 'solve' the case using hard evidence, and prosecute the actual perp, while also respecting people's constitutional rights.
In terms of family law and child protective services, IMO those laws have been written for non-criminal situations. No one is considered to have committed a crime in family law. The actions taken in that context are not intended to punish people for wrong-doing, but to try to aid families in staying together for the benefit of all. IMO, taking a child away from her mother is an extreme act of interference in the natural rights of women to give birth and raise their own children, and there has to be very strong evidence of serious harm to take that action. IMO, the school was getting vibes of a relatively minor harm that M wasn't getting the education that a 9 year old needs, and were starting to make noises about that, as a solveable problem. But, as far as I can tell, no one suspected Ashley as being likely to physically harm Melodee.
IMO, Ashley may have gone nuclear on a very minor, easily solved family law issue. I think that's on her, she's responsible, it was her choice, no one could have predicted or prevented her from deliberately doing that, just like in any other crime.
JMO