CA CA - San Francisco, WhtMale, 50-80, UP9209, found in steamer trunk mailed by "Gerry Fidele" in NJ, homicide by gunshot, recent head surgery, Apr '68

citizen_sleuth

Verified family member - Orie Donald Esh thread
Joined
Aug 2, 2021
Messages
2,290
Reaction score
23,426
NamUs #UP9209

Demographics
Sex: Male
Race/Ethnicity: White / Caucasian
Estimated Age Group: Adult
Estimated Age Range (Years): 50-80
Estimated Year of Death: 1968
Estimated PMI: N/A (News reports say 10 days)
Height: 5'7" (67 inches), Measured
Weight: 116 lbs, Measured (News reports say he weighed around 180-190 lbs)
Cause of Death: Homicide by gunshot to back

Circumstances
Type: Unidentified Deceased
Date Body Found: April 10, 1968
NamUs Case Created: August 30, 2011
ME/C QA Reviewed: August 31, 2011
Location Found: San Francisco, California
County: San Francisco County
Circumstances of Recovery: A black steamer trunk sealed with surgical tape was received at the Railway Express Agency from the Newark Railway Express terminal, Newark, New Jersey. It was sent by a middle-aged white female with greying hair dressed in all black, approximately 5-feet-2-inches tall and 120 pounds, who gave the name "Gerry Fidele."

Railway Express explained that they had picked up the trunk from "Gerry" at the Belmont Hotel in Newark on April 1, but none of the workers at the hotel had heard of "Gerry." The trunk was addressed to "Janet Farise, San Francisco," with a note saying "Will call." Authorities could find no record of a "Janet Farise" in San Francisco and believe it was a fake name.

On April 10, Railway Express workers in San Francisco's Bayview District noticed a very foul odor coming from the trunk. Platform worker Dirk Vandenakker peeled back the surgical tape on the trunk and saw a shoulder poking out from underneath a bedsheet.

The man had been hog-tied with heavy twine, with his knees pulled up to his face. An autopsy revealed the man had been killed by a .32-caliber single gunshot wound to the back, just below the left shoulder. He was wrapped in a bedsheet which bore the name of an undisclosed hotel and surrounded by pillows. Police checked with all hotels of the name on the sheet but it produced no leads.
Inventory of Remains: All parts recovered
Condition of Remains: Recognizable face

Physical Description
Hair Color: Gray or Partially Gray
Head Hair Description: Sparse, receding at the forehead and temples
Eye Color: Brown
Distinctive Physical Features: He had a drainage tube in his skull and may have recently undergone head surgery.

Clothing and Accessories
- Inside the trunk: 4 sheets, 2 pillows; 3 men's shirts; 2 pillow cases; 2 sofa cushions. terry cloth robe; 2 wash clothes; a quilt
- Undershirt size 42; red pajama bottoms (On the Body)
- Socks (On the Body)

News Coverage
"Grisly Find in A Trunk: Body of Man Shipped Here," San Francisco Examiner, 10 April 1968, 3.
Grisly Find in A Trunk_.jpg

The body of a man was found here today in a steamer trunk shipped from Newark, N.J. to the Railway Express Agency facility in the Bayview District.

The body, swathed in what appeared to be a bedsheet and cushioned by gaily colored sofa pillows, had been shipped from Newark by train on April 4. Mothballs had been sprinkled in the bedding.

[...]

The body was discovered by Dirk Vandenakker, 24, a platform worker at the express office at 1815 Egbert St.

Vandenakker told Homicide Inspector Gus Coreris he had noted an offensive odor from the trunk. He said he ripped off the surgical tape sealing the lid, opened the trunk and viewed the bare arm and shoulder of a woman.


"Shipped By 'Little Old Lady': Trunk Murder Mystery," San Francisco Examiner, 11 April 1968, 3.
Shipped By 'Little Old Lady'_.jpg

Detective Dan Scurese of Newark said the woman, described as "tiny, with greying hair," called Railway Express employes' attention to the trunk and paid the freight charge.

"The employes said the trunk was on the loading platform when they first saw it," Scurese continued. "A tiny woman obviously couldn't have got it there without help."

The detective said also that the possibility the victim, who had been shot through the heart, was slain in a "syndicate killing" was under consideration.

The woman, dressed all in black, told the employe who handled the shipment her last name was "Fedele" and that she lived in the Belmont Hotel at Newark. Nobody at the hotel had heard of her.

She paid $57.50 to ship the body and gave the employe a 55-cent tip.

The trunk was addressed to "Janet Farise, San Francisco," with the notation "Will call." Homicide Inspectors Gus Coreris and John Fotinos have been unable to locate anyone of that name here and doubt that such a person exists.

The victim, described as "hulking," weighed around 190 pounds, Coroner Henry Turkel said, and was attired in red trousers and a white silk jacket. He had been dead 10 days, Turkel said.

[...]

Officials became suspicious when they smelled an odor and observed that the trunk was sealed with surgical tape.


"Mystery Woman Described In S.F. Trunk Murder Case," Oakland Tribune, 11 April 1968, 1, 2.
[part 1] [part 2]
Mystery Woman Described In S.F. Trunk Murder Case,_ pt. 1.jpg
Mystery Woman Described In S.F. Trunk Murder Case,_ pt. 2.jpg

She signed the receipt "Gerry Fidele" and was described as about 5 feet 2, 120 pounds, greying hair, in her 50's and wearing a black dress, black coat and stylish black hat.

[...]

A single bullet had entered through the back below the left shoulder blade, passed through the heart, nicked a rib and lodged just under the skin on the chest.

Decomposition had wiped out facial features.

The body had been hog tied with heavy twine with the knees drawn up to the face by the cord tied around the man's neck.

He was dressed in red pajamas and an undershirt and wrapped in a bedsheet. Extra space in the 38 by 21 by 23 inch trunk was stuffed with brightly colored sofa pillows. There were mothballs in the bottom.


"Man's Body Found In Trunk in SF," Press Democrat [Santa Rosa, CA], 11 April 1968, 27.
Man's Body Found In Trunk in SF_.jpg


"Trunk Victim Had Recent Surgery," Central New Jersey Home News [New Brunswick, NJ], 14 April 1968, 10.
Trunk Victim Had Recent Surgery_.jpg

An autopsy disclosed that the murdered man who was expressed here in a steamer trunk had undergone recent head surgery and still had a drainage tube in his skull, coroner's officers has announced.

"Hope Dental Charts Identify Man in Trunk," News [Paterson, NJ], 3 June 1968, 14.
Hope Dental Charts Identify Man in Trunk_.jpg

An autopsy of the badly decomposed body showed he died from a .32-caliber gunshot wound. The sheet wrapped around the victim bore the name of a hotel. Kinney said police checked out all hotels with the name without turning up any clues.
 
I wonder if they tried contacting hospitals in NJ for men who recently had head surgery and fit the description of the UID. In the pre-HIPAA era, I imagine police probably would’ve been able to get their hands on this information relatively easily.
This seems like a really good clue. Even in 1968, I can’t imagine brain surgery with a drain would be common? Unfortunately, the records would no longer exist now.
 
Is anyone a subscriber?

This page comes up from a Google search for "Geraldine Fedele."


?
 
The mother of the same Geraldine Fedele mentioned above was a department store manager in Harrison, NY, which is about an hours drive to Newark. She lived in Harrison from 1949 to 1976. It appears as though Geraldine was never married, or went by her maiden name.

Helen Rose Fedele obituary, Daily Times [Mamaroneck, NY], 2 May 1990, A4.
Helen Rose Fedele.jpg
 
Fedele means “loyal” in Italian — perhaps he was involved in organized crime and was killed for being an informant/to send a message. The woman may have been used as a decoy. It also seems unlikely that a “little old lady” could hogtie a nearly 200 pound man and place him in a wooden chest all by herself.
 
The mother of the same Geraldine Fedele mentioned above was a department store manager in Harrison, NY, which is about an hours drive to Newark. She lived in Harrison from 1949 to 1976. It appears as though Geraldine was never married, or went by her maiden name.

Helen Rose Fedele obituary, Daily Times [Mamaroneck, NY], 2 May 1990, A4.
View attachment 392548
A couple of minor corrections: H.F. worked in a department store in Connecticut, then moved to Harrison, NY after leaving the job. So it's less likely that someone remembered the name of the store manager's daughter (if G.F. was even born at the time) for 20 years, then used it for a crime.

I think "her daughter, Geraldine [R.] of New Milford, Conn." in the third paragraph is the same Geraldine as in the records Victoria found. It's unlikely that she and "Gerry Fidele," sender of the gruesome package, are the same person. First of all, she would've had to have misspelled her last name on the packing receipt. G.R. also wouldn't be old enough to be seen as "in her 50s" in 1968. She wouldn't even have gray hair yet! Nor is there any evidence she ever went by "Gerry." Note that the obituary for Mrs. Fedele, which quotes Geraldine under that form of her name, also lists the other Fedele daughter as Connie; the Poughkeepsie Journal article mentions "Constance and Geraldine Fedele," presumably the same sisters, so I'm inclined to think G.R. would have used her preferred name in the obituary.


Most likely the G.F. name was lifted by someone. (Or made up, but it's a distinctive name--wouldn't something like "Sally Smith" come more easily to the average American?) It's interesting that both "sender" and "receiver" are women with trendy American forenames and Italian surnames.

I wonder if the woman behind "Gerry Fidele" was wealthy, and John Doe was her associate of some sort. She's described as dressed "stylishly" in all-black. John Doe was dressed in a white silk jacket and red trousers, possibly pajamas. He had been wrapped in hotel linens (I assume not from the Belmont where "G.F." claimed she lived) and the box filled with "gaily colored" floral-patterned sofa cushions and mothballs. Did the pillows come from the same place as the linens? Or did the killer just have a spare set lying around?

John Doe also had a drainage tube in his skull, of the type used after surgery. So he had been suffering some kind of brain-related malady that was 1. detectable and 2. treatable with 1960s technology. For comparison, the MRI and CAT scan technologies, which allow the brain itself to be seen without straight-up opening the skull, wouldn't be developed for another three or four years. Surgeons had to be certain they had located the problem with X-rays and symptomatic diagnoses. That meant not many people would have had brain surgery at the time John Doe did. It was largely restricted to tumor removal and lumbar punctures, if I'm reading my history correctly. So maybe he would have been suffering from something like headaches, hallucinations, or personality changes in the time leading up to his death, and had sought medical attention from a hospital with neurosurgeons. The placement of the drain means it's probably not an LP (IMHO,) but there's no mention of trauma to the skull, and something had to have been cut through to get at the problem. (Warning for gory stuff under the spoiler)
There were of course, lobotomies happening, but those involved surgery to the front of the brain, not the back where our Doe's drain was. They involved going into through the eye socket with tools. And they usually didn't seem to be used on older men who weren't in "homes for the clinically insane."
Maybe it was impossible to tell what the tube was for, or the detectives kept it classified to confirm who he was?


The initial (ahem) disposal of this Doe's remains was not cheap. The postage is listed as $57.40, with a 55-cent tip. Today, that's equivalent to about $500 and $5. "Gerry," a very petite older woman, also apparently just...showed up on the loading dock with a very heavy (215 lb., about 98 kg) trunk, which doesn't look to have wheels, raising suspicions she had help carrying it. Paid porters? Partners in crime? Who knows.

Man, what a horrible case. This would be a good candidate for genetic genealogy. Double :eek: at this line in the Oakland Tribune item: "[The worker/s] noticed a slight odor initially but paid no attention because biological specimens are sometimes shipped in that manner."
 
What a strange case...

Given it's an older lady dumping an older man dressed in pajamas, with the body surrounded in old colored sofa cushions, I would think it's more likely a husband/wife situation than organised crime. It seems weird to mail the body across the country instead of just dumping it. Perhaps she had no other means of disposal.
 
What a strange case...

Given it's an older lady dumping an older man dressed in pajamas, with the body surrounded in old colored sofa cushions, I would think it's more likely a husband/wife situation than organised crime. It seems weird to mail the body across the country instead of just dumping it. Perhaps she had no other means of disposal.
I generally agree that it sounds like a domestic situation but if that is the case, who helped her dispose of the body? The trunk was picked up at the Belmont Hotel, but none of the employees had heard of "Gerry" or a woman matching her description, so he must have been killed elsewhere and brought to the hotel. I don't see how a "little old lady" would be able to do that by herself. Perhaps a son/male relative helped?
 
More like she was corralled into assisting some 'wise guys'
to dispose of a body the guys had murdered. Little old ladies
are less likely to have their mugshots recorded in police
files. And I remember clearly back in the 70's, older
mature or elderly Italian ladies whose husbands were
deceased (and even if the husband had been deceased
for quite some time) always wore all black clothing.
 
I generally agree that it sounds like a domestic situation but if that is the case, who helped her dispose of the body? The trunk was picked up at the Belmont Hotel, but none of the employees had heard of "Gerry" or a woman matching her description, so he must have been killed elsewhere and brought to the hotel. I don't see how a "little old lady" would be able to do that by herself. Perhaps a son/male relative helped?

Yeah, I can't really explain that part, and have now gone back and forth on husband/wife vs an organised crime.

Given the weight of the trunk, it seems like she would need the help of a couple of people who either knowingly or unknowingly assisted. As you say, even getting him tied up and into the trunk would surely be difficult for a small older lady, which favours the involvement of others in the crime. The way he was shot is also a bit like an execution - once though the heart. On the other hand, perhaps it was a wife shooting a husband in his sleep, and some recent brain surgery had been a factor in that. NAMUS indicates he was wearing pajamas, which made me think he was shot in his sleep, although one newspaper report says "red trousers and a white silk jacket", so it seems a bit uncertain.

Since there was bedding from another hotel, initially I wondered if she shot him at one, rolled him into the trunk, and had porters bring him out the front of the Belmont to avert suspicion. Although if that were the case, the investigation would've probably found some evidence of it. So perhaps he was instead shot at a home and wrapped in spare, mothballed linen that originally came from a hotel.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
94
Guests online
637
Total visitors
731

Forum statistics

Threads
625,467
Messages
18,504,361
Members
240,808
Latest member
zoeep
Back
Top