- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 56,465
- Reaction score
- 167,292

Courtesy of CBC
CBC podcast examines a grisly murder in a unique cultural context
Who killed Sharmini? A suspect is in prison — but not for teen's death
In the latest season of the CBC investigative podcast Uncover, host Michelle Shephard revisits the unsolved homicide of a Toronto teen two decades after she first covered the case as a cub crime reporter at the Toronto Star.
- Listen and subscribe to Uncover: Sharmini at CBC.ca/uncover or on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts or Spotify.
"Sharmini Anandavel wanted to buy shoes to match the mauve dress she was going to wear to her Grade 9 graduation.
The 15-year-old was just weeks away from leaving behind junior high when she last left her north Toronto apartment building in June 1999, telling her family she was headed to a new job.
Four months later, her skeletal remains were found in a shallow grave in a wooded ravine, right next to the Don River.
Twenty years after her death, no one has been charged.
But police had a prime suspect from the very night she went missing: A 23-year-old neighbour who lived one floor down from the Anandavels.
Police interrogated him, searched his car and apartment, put him under round-the-clock surveillance and interviewed those who knew him.
He is behind bars today — but not for Sharmini's death."
...................................................................................................................................................
"Sharmini thought she was going to work undercover for an anti-drug police operation. They had found a blank job application in her bedroom for something called the Metro Search Unit, an outfit that police later described as "completely bogus."
The application had a typo and was strangely worded. It only asked for the applicant's name, birthdate, address and age; there were no spots to jot down an employment history, references or a social insurance number."
"I came onto this case fresh off of leaving the Christine Jessop reinvestigation. So all the sore points that we kind of got stuck with from Christine Jessop and Guy Paul Morin were still very fresh," said Crone. "Quite frequently, when we started the investigation, you know, we'd asked the team ... 'Is there any other explanation? Are there any other suspects? Should we be looking at an alternative theory? Should we be thinking of something else?' And the responses I get were like blank looks going, 'What, are you stupid?' … It was kind of overwhelmingly all roads lead back to Stan."
Crone also said his team knew that in order to charge Tippett, the evidence had to be compelling — and that just wasn’t there."