CO - The Stalking and Mysterious Death of Morgan Ingram #3

[laurafairlie]

'''
So does she want help or not. I am sorry but something is wrong.. Why not re-open the case, I thought this was what this was about

She does want it reopened, but by state or federal authorities.

 

[21merc7]

Found legal assistance in the area:

http://www.alpinelegalservices.com/

If they don't want to go the Glenwood Springs area, there is also Aspen area.

ETA: I post this as the family is asking for donations for a private investigator, so, that makes me think they lack the funding, so would I. In order to get the case looked into, they need an attorney to review the documentation, along with the necessary expert reviews, to determine where the case can go. Not being snarky by suggesting this, just trying to help. This place can coordinate the necessary efforts and get them going.

 

[Lena]

I am curious about how an autopsy is worded. Pulmonary edema is something that can be visually seen, but not porphyria (at least not from my brief research). And from what I've read, testing for it can be pretty tricky, especially if a person is not in the middle of an acute attack. So does the autopsy report then say that she definitively HAD porphyria? And if so, how does a coroner come to that conclusion post mortem? I thought it was questioned as a possible dx a few years back, but the way I've read snippets regarding the autopsy, it seems as if the porphyria is being listed as a component that was existing at the time of her death, if not a compounding or contributing factor (before it was changed to suicide).

I'm curios b/c I'm assuming that porphyria could have lead to pulmonary edema, in which case it might seem a slam dunk for 'natural causes'. However, it would be REALLY lackadaisical and negligent IMO to go on a prior health history presumption and not actually test to see if the 'maybe' dx was even existing.

 

[nursebeeme]

I am curious about how an autopsy is worded. Pulmonary edema is something that can be visually seen, but not porphyria (at least not from my brief research). And from what I've read, testing for it can be pretty tricky, especially if a person is not in the middle of an acute attack. So does the autopsy report then say that she definitively HAD porphyria? And if so, how does a coroner come to that conclusion post mortem? I thought it was questioned as a possible dx a few years back, but the way I've read snippets regarding the autopsy, it seems as if the porphyria is being listed as a component that was existing at the time of her death, if not a compounding or contributing factor (before it was changed to suicide).

I'm curios b/c I'm assuming that porphyria could have lead to pulmonary edema, in which case it might seem a slam dunk for 'natural causes'. However, it would be REALLY lackadaisical and negligent IMO to go on a prior health history presumption and not actually test to see if the 'maybe' dx was even existing.

bbm: the mother has not shared this report as far as I know. I would like to see it as well. We really don't know what the ME was basing the intermittent porphyria on.

 

[alwaysonmymind]

:twocents: To me the fact that Morgan saw an old boyfriend and a new love interest the day before she died is a huge red flag. Whether her death was murder, suicide, or accidental, the presence of at least one of these guys is significant. JMHO of course.

And this x is the same guy that M drove to the airport in 2/2011 along with the extra 'friend' that M didn't want to go.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[nursebeeme]

new thread:

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=185398"]The Stalking and Mysterious Death of Morgan Ingram #4 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]


move on over.. this one will close shortly

 

[Lena]

bbm: the mother has not shared this report as far as I know. I would like to see it as well. We really don't know what the ME was basing the intermittent porphyria on.

I guess my question is, assuming he listed the porphyria as an existing condition, how WRONG would it be for the ME to put something on her official report that never had been proven to exist? Whether in the past or post mortem?

Regardless of anything else, I get a strong feeling that he knows he totally FUBAR'ed this case, and wants it to just go away.

 

[nursebeeme]

I guess my question is, assuming he listed the porphyria as an existing condition, how WRONG would it be for the ME to put something on her official report that never had been proven to exist? Whether in the past or post mortem?

Regardless of anything else, I get a strong feeling that he knows he totally FUBAR'ed this case, and wants it to just go away.

as a nurse I want to see the report so I guess I am just assuming nothing until (and if...) we get to see that report.

 

[nursebeeme]

new thread:

The Stalking and Mysterious Death of Morgan Ingram #4 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community


move on over.. this one will close shortly

doors are closing here... move on over