GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #71

[waldojabba]

Gifted no paywall

Client Challenge

 

[LosAngeles]

KM law license suspension ends June, 2026. I wonder if he'll practice law?

 

[Jmoose]

KM law license suspension ends June, 2026. I wonder if he'll practice law?

Sure-why not? He can scam people who go to him for immigration law help. Isn’t it one of the types of law he previously practiced? I mean, I doubt that people who could go to anyone else would use him, but he has to support himself. I hope nobody’s been counting on him for child support payments in the last 5 or 6 years.

 

[Seattle1]

Gifted no paywall

Client Challenge

Thank you, @waldojabba.

Reads like a prelude to Mt's next civil suit!

Poor MT hasn't had her IUD replaced on schedule--- or seen the dentist, while incarcerated at York...

 

[LosAngeles]

Thank you, @waldojabba.

Reads like a prelude to Mt's next civil suit!

Poor MT hasn't had her IUD replaced on schedule--- or seen the dentist, while incarcerated at York...

Staffing shortages and lack of physicians has been a chronic challenge at York, so she's just highlighting something that is well known and hard to resolve. Working at a prison isn't necessarily a cache career, so I'm sure if given a choice, medical professionals would much prefer to work/treat the general public vs scary women. If you need another reason not to commit a crime, read this article. No fun being incarcerated.

 

[Seattle1]

If you can't do the time (and all that comes with it-- including delayed healthcare), don't do the crime!

 

[Megnut]

Hey, can someone ask the inmate a question for me?

Was JFd afforded adequate medical care after the assault in her garage?

Inmate is tiresome.

JMO

 

[Seattle1]

Ok, I found it -- Writ is filed under civil case inquiry...
TSR-CV24-5001865-S - TROCONIS, MICHELLE #433612 v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=TSRCV245001865S

Motions for Extensions of time to file post-trial brief granted,
and Court also granted Motions for Permission to file briefs longer than permitted by Rule PB 4-6,

On 4/20/26, Court granted unopposed Petitioner's Motion for Extension to file response brief: The petitioner and respondent both required additional time to file their main trial briefs and both required additional pages due to the quantity of evidentiary materials involved.
Extension granted to 4/24/26.
_________________________

Links to Post-trial Briefs and Motions....

4/9/26 - Respondent's post-trial brief filed, pgs 1-50.

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=32405508

4/15/25 - Petitioner's post trial brief filed, pgs 1-54.

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=32441409

4/24/26 - Petitioner's reply brief filed, pgs 1-12.

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=32518386

Additional entries to the Docket on 4/24/26:

4/24/26 --RESPONDENT’S REPLY TO PETITIONER’S POST-TRIAL BRIEF, pgs 1-11.

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=32521673

4/24/26 -- TRIAL COMPLETED-DECISION RESERVED

RESULT: HON CARL SCHUMAN

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=TSRCV245001865S

No Events/Court Dates filed as of 4/30/26.

 

[Niner]

Additional entries to the Docket on 4/24/26:

4/24/26 --RESPONDENT’S REPLY TO PETITIONER’S POST-TRIAL BRIEF, pgs 1-11.

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=32521673

4/24/26 -- TRIAL COMPLETED-DECISION RESERVED

RESULT: HON CARL SCHUMAN

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=TSRCV245001865S

No Events/Court Dates filed as of 4/30/26.

Ah! You read my mind - I was just going to ask about her appeal on her 5th Amendment violation though. Anything happening - hearings was on 1/16/26.
Not too sure which one - this one: A.C. #47734 filed 7/17/24 or
this one - per my notes.
3/24/25: Appeal-Order on Motion for Review AC243465. . Review is granted but the relief requested is denied. On 12/5/25, Troconis filed a Motion seeking to Transfer the Appeal from the Appellate Court to Supreme Court & the Court has not responded to the Motion, as of this date [1/14/26].

 

[Niner]

Additional entries to the Docket on 4/24/26:

4/24/26 --RESPONDENT’S REPLY TO PETITIONER’S POST-TRIAL BRIEF, pgs 1-11.

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=32521673

4/24/26 -- TRIAL COMPLETED-DECISION RESERVED

RESULT: HON CARL SCHUMAN

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=TSRCV245001865S

No Events/Court Dates filed as of 4/30/26.

I can not access either one of these.... dang! Just wondering on the second one - what was the Judge's decision? denied? or ??

 

[Seattle1]

I can not access either one of these.... dang! Just wondering on the second one - what was the Judge's decision? denied? or ??

Re. case status, the last entry on 4/24 indicates "decision reserved."

"Trial Completed-Decision Reserved" means the court has heard all evidence and arguments but will not issue an immediate ruling. The judge is taking time to review the case, research, and deliberate before releasing a written decision at a later date. No further submissions are typically allowed during this time.

 

[Niner]

Re. case status, the last entry on 4/24 indicates "decision reserved."

"Trial Completed-Decision Reserved" means the court has heard all evidence and arguments but will not issue an immediate ruling. The judge is taking time to review the case, research, and deliberate before releasing a written decision at a later date. No further submissions are typically allowed during this time.

Do you mean they JUST got it in April - from the January hearing?? Boy they take a long time - but I guess we have all the time in the world to wait. At least she stays in prison!

And thanks for explanation!

edited to add - I should have read my own notes - I see they extended time to file the briefs by 4/24/26. Ok!

 

[LosAngeles]

And I think someone said judge has 120 days to issue a ruling, so summertime we should hear something. Such a waste of taxpayers money, but I guess it's very common to appeal. IDK.

 

[Seattle1]

Ah! You read my mind - I was just going to ask about her appeal on her 5th Amendment violation though. Anything happening - hearings was on 1/16/26.
Not too sure which one - this one: A.C. #47734 filed 7/17/24 or
this one - per my notes.
3/24/25: Appeal-Order on Motion for Review AC243465. . Review is granted but the relief requested is denied. On 12/5/25, Troconis filed a Motion seeking to Transfer the Appeal from the Appellate Court to Supreme Court & the Court has not responded to the Motion, as of this date [1/14/26].

Take note the Appeal filed by the State [#47734 filed 7/17/24] was withdrawn/disposed by the State on 5/9/2025.

MT only has her instant/direct Appeal pending at this time [AC 47877 filed 8/5/24]. The respondent received an extension to 6/29/26 to file their brief, and the Court has not responded to MT's 12/5/25 Motion seeking to transfer this case from the Appellate Court to the Supreme Court.

The Writ of Habeas Corpus dated 9/13/2024 has been briefed, and the trial held in civil court. The decision by Judge Carl Schuman is pending! [TSR-CV24-5001865-S - TROCONIS, MICHELLE #433612 v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION].

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=TSRCV245001865S

Supreme/Appellate Case Look-up

 

[Niner]

Take note the Appeal filed by the State [#47734 filed 7/17/24] was withdrawn/disposed by the State on 5/9/2025.

MT only has her instant/direct Appeal pending at this time [AC 47877 filed 8/5/24]. The respondent received an extension to 6/29/26 to file their brief, and the Court has not responded to MT's 12/5/25 Motion seeking to transfer this case from the Appellate Court to the Supreme Court.

The Writ of Habeas Corpus dated 9/13/2024 has been briefed, and the trial held in civil court. The decision by Judge Carl Schuman is pending! [TSR-CV24-5001865-S - TROCONIS, MICHELLE #433612 v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION].

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=TSRCV245001865S

Supreme/Appellate Case Look-up

ACK!! LOL!! Okay - I will make note of all this! Thanks!

 

[Niner]

Since there won't be a decision until about August [~120 days] - I shall move her there in my notes...