Federal Court Judges discuss peanut butter sandwiches

Casshew

Former Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
27,884
Reaction score
317
  • #1
Three federal judges yesterday questioned whether the method for creating a crustless, peanut butter and jelly sandwich is unique.

The hearing, at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, was the latest round in J.M. Smucker Co.'s attempt to expand its patent on Uncrustables, frozen, disk-shaped peanut butter and jelly sandwiches that have been among the Orrville, Ohio, jam-maker's most successful products.

The three judges explored the difference between bread that is "smushed" versus "compressed," and pondered the idea of jelly "encapsulated" in peanut butter. One even questioned whether his wife violated Smucker's patent when she made lunch for their child.


Yesterday, Smucker lawyer, Robert Vickers of Fay, Sharpe, Fagan, Minnich & McKee LLP of Cleveland, argued that the sandwich's edge isn't made like the tarts or raviolis shown in the cookbook. Instead, he said, the bread retains its original characteristics but its edges are compressed.

"So it's smushed!" Judge Raymond Clevenger III declared,

"It is sealed by compression, but it is not smushed," Mr. Vickers explained.


Read the rest here
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
108
Guests online
1,539
Total visitors
1,647

Forum statistics

Threads
635,382
Messages
18,674,840
Members
243,190
Latest member
sherlocknothere8989
Back
Top