- Joined
- Jul 23, 2018
- Messages
- 1,115
- Reaction score
- 3,984
It is possible he got a fake/new name and Social Security number. He may not have wanted to be findable by his family given that there were issues in the family. I doubt it, but you never know.
#2Questions for websleuths that relate to this case:
#1 How were john does handled by law enforcement in the 60s? Was there a difference between small towns and the cities?
#2 Are there any reasons why someone may not continue using their social security number that don't relate directly with death? Is there any reasonable situation in which his last contact with law enforcement be vagrancy in 1963?
More will be added if I can think of any +++
My understanding is the surviving brother found out his last name was not Hamilton when he went to join the military. At this moment he found out he was Armantrout. So none of the boys had proper information. I wonder if David was going by Hamilton or Armantrout when he was arrested? I assume Armantrout#2
It used to be much easier to fake a new identity, which could be desired for many reasons including running away from the law or personal issues.. If I recall the general idea of how it worked back then, you find a young child's grave roughly the same age and get the birth date from the grave. Then find where they were born and get a copy of the birth certificate. The use that info to get a new ID and SSN. Back then young children didn't have SSNs.
That would be useful information to have.My understanding is the surviving brother found out his last name was not Hamilton when he went to join the military. At this moment he found out he was Armantrout. So none of the boys had proper information. I wonder if David was going by Hamilton or Armantrout when he was arrested? I assume Armantrout
So incredibly and very frustratingly the one year of the yearbook I needed was missing which would be David's senior year and would of at least given us a face go look at. There's 3 years of year books in both directions but not that one. So frustrating. I went through every page to see if there was a mention of him. I'll try again today.@AlexFromnic hi! Did you ever manage to confirm the schools he attended? This would be a good starting point I think. I've still not seen a photo or even a description of him?
I believe when they ran his name it came out for being arrested in Lee County Florida for vagrant. Which means he was homeless there. So I'm not sure what they were looking at during this time perhaps this was criminal records only in which case maybe he has been law abiding the rest of his life?I'm not sure if his SS number is known? If there's an article stating that it hasn't been used, then I would assume they have run it already.
Some good points here. One thing I do find indicative that an SS number or something specifically identifying (likely an SS) was involved was because the find of vagrancy was found during a live session and being his name is so common "David Hamilton" id imagine an SS number would be needed to be looked up or else there would be a million Hamiltons and no way to know for sure it was him. So I can't think of anything else they could of used other than an SS number to differentiate him I was assuming it was that.Keep in mind that "vagrancy" didn't necessarily mean homelessness. Especially in the 60s, arrests for it took myriad reasons from drunkenness (the pre-cursor to more encompassing yet less flashy "public intoxication," to loitering to just being a pain in the *advertiser censored* with the wrong officer. Coupled with the fact you can be arrested w/o a SSN, I wouldn't assume he was dead shortly after 1963.
I agree you'd think there would be a paper trail, but he ran away. To me that implies not wanting to be found, at least initially. It stands to reason he would go by another name, 'legally' or not. Maybe he was savvy and created an official identity and a back story, or perhaps (and to me, more likely) he just worked odd jobs for cash and lived simply. In FL weather, for all we know he lived in someone's barn or shed in return for horse grooming or property chores. It's entirely possible he was off the grid enough he didn't believe anyone was looking for him. And it sounds like he didn't write or tell his brother he was taking off, so maybe he didn't care if they were. Or he did but mentally told himself he was beyond the point of return.
All that being said, he still could have died after 1963. But that doesn't mean he's a Doe. He could've been buried by people who knew him but not his true identity, he might have wandered off on drugs or from Alzheimer's and died in the woods, he might have committed suicide in a cave and hasn't been located, or accidently fallen off a ship he stowed away on, or murdered and put down an abandoned well. It seems like the best bet is genealogy and the ever-increasing usage of DNA testing.