"Nice was fun when it lasted. See you at 4:30 pm at my house, then." 9:38 am
Ironically, I have been making decisions, researching and sleuthing here long before nearly all the "youtubers" became a factor on all these cases. So many repeating information we have already discussed here....so I pretty much ignore most of them.
(don't even know how to "subscribe & like", guess I'm not contributing to their ratings or algorithms.) Some of the legal technical discussions are way over my head and no doubt impressive legal argument theory. The "chink in the armor" is that most of the jurors who are going to decide the guilt or innocence of the accused individuals are going to be more like me. Just because a person leaves out one or two items in a complicated recipe, doesn't mean they weren't following a preplanned outcome. So far, all the arguments for why WA will not be an indictable co-conspirator has been "miniscule" compared to all the other ingredients.
If WA & DA had been tried together, DA would still be found guilty and WA just might have enough "plausible deniability" to not get convicted of 1st degree murder, LWOP. WA's last text to Danny Markel is so revealing....she knew, IMO..but not "HOW."
"Nice was good when it lasted. See you at 4:30pm today at my house at 4:30pm, then."
If she knew she would see him at 4:30 pm...why did she have to drive by his house at 12.35 pm?????