FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen-Donna Adelson Upcoming Trial - *5 Guilty* #28

[Wishbone]

IMO it is more than obvious that WA was the conduit on DM's movements making sure DM would be where they wanted him to be in order to murder him. Add to that her conflicting testimonies at various trials and it is clear as rain to me that she was an integral conspirator. Opinions are just that and need no justification.

 

[Going Rogue]

IMO it is more than obvious that WA was the conduit on DM's movements making sure DM would be where they wanted him to be in order to murder him. Add to that her conflicting testimonies at various trials and it is clear as rain to me that she was an integral conspirator. Opinions are just that and need no justification.

It seems more than obvious to a lot of people, yet more than 11 years after the murder Wendi has not been charged? Either it’s not so obvious to the Tally DA’s office or they don’t think the can meet the burden of proof. Even if she provided conflicting statements or inconsistent testimony in all 4 trials, that does not prove she participated in the plot. Not going to go there, but I can name more than one witness for the prosecution that provided inconsistent statements across the 4 trials. As far as Wendi being the conduit for Dan’s movements, there is absolutely no proof of this – its just one of the many assumptions being made in social media. In a capital murder case, a prosecutor needs to provide evidence based on facts not assumptions.

Can you answer how the state proves she committed an overt act, or how to they prove that she willingly entered into a conspiratorial agreement in the plot to murder Dan? This question is open to anyone – maybe I’m missing something?

 

[Wishbone]

It seems more than obvious to a lot of people, yet more than 11 years after the murder Wendi has not been charged? Either it’s not so obvious to the Tally DA’s office or they don’t think the can meet the burden of proof. Even if she provided conflicting statements or inconsistent testimony in all 4 trials, that does not prove she participated in the plot. Not going to go there, but I can name more than one witness for the prosecution that provided inconsistent statements across the 4 trials. As far as Wendi being the conduit for Dan’s movements, there is absolutely no proof of this – its just one of the many assumptions being made in social media. In a capital murder case, a prosecutor needs to provide evidence based on facts not assumptions.

Can you answer how the state proves she committed an overt act, or how to they prove that she willingly entered into a conspiratorial agreement in the plot to murder Dan? This question is open to anyone – maybe I’m missing something?

As I stated in my post it is my opinion and I'm sticking to it.