FL - Woman drowns dog in airport bathroom and throws it in trash to avoid missing flight - Orange County, 12/16/25

Clearsky

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2023
Messages
2,013
Reaction score
3,061
A woman drowned her dog in a Florida airport bathroom and then boarded her international flight after she was prevented from bringing the white miniature schnauzer with her because of a paperwork issue, authorities said.

The woman was arrested in Lake County on Wednesday on a charge of aggravated animal abuse, a third-degree felony. She was released on $5,000 bail.

"This act was intentional and resulted in a cruel and unnecessary death of the animal," said an arrest affidavit from the Orlando Police Department.


I literally could not believe what I was reading. If I can't board with my dog - neither of us is going anywhere but back home!!
 
This is such a disturbing story! It makes me feel sick.

I wonder, wasn’t there anyone else in the bathroom at the time she was doing the drowning?!! The poor dog must have made noises while fighting for its life.
 
clearly this poor pup wasn't a family member but was an accessory, easy to replace when this one became inconvenient.

Disgusting woman whose name is apparently Alison Lawrence, of Kenner, Louisiana.

Woman charged with drowning pet dog in Florida airport bathroom

Woman allegedly drowns dog in airport bathroom after it wasn't allowed on international flight

Tywinn was 9 years old :(
If only an accessory, I doubt the dog would have had a companion vest, collar, rabies tag, travel bag and a bone -shaped tag with it's owners name and contact info. Micro chipped to owner as well.

Picture (mugshot) of our lovely heartless pet lover included in article.

JMO



The dog had a companion vest, collar, rabies tag, a dog travel bag and a bone-shaped dog tag with Lawrence’s name and contact information.

An implanted microchip provided Tywinn’s identity to investigators. A necropsy determined that the schnauzer had been drowned.


 
If only an accessory, I doubt the dog would have had a companion vest, collar, rabies tag, travel bag and a bone -shaped tag with it's owners name and contact info. Micro chipped to owner as well.

Picture (mugshot) of our lovely heartless pet lover included in article.

JMO



The dog had a companion vest, collar, rabies tag, a dog travel bag and a bone-shaped dog tag with Lawrence’s name and contact information.

An implanted microchip provided Tywinn’s identity to investigators. A necropsy determined that the schnauzer had been drowned.


Maybe not an accessory although I still think she viewed it as such but it was certainly not a valued family member if she could so easily drown the poor thing in an airport bathroom because he was suddenly inconvenient and leave his body in a waste receptacle.
 
Special place in hell for her.
I could barely stand to read this story. They should stick her head in an airport bathroom indefinitely. She loved the dog enough to try and take him, and then disliked him enough to kill him? what did she do, just leave him in there? This is a sickening story made real by a very sick woman. MOO Katt
 
I could barely stand to read this story. They should stick her head in an airport bathroom indefinitely. She loved the dog enough to try and take him, and then disliked him enough to kill him? what did she do, just leave him in there? This is a sickening story made real by a very sick woman. MOO Katt
In plain view of surveillance cameras, after speaking to an airline agent for several minutes, Lawrence walked into a bathroom near the ticketing area with the dog. She allegedly exited the bathroom without the schnauzer less than 20 minutes later.


Lawrence soon re-entered the terminal and traveled to Colombia, according to reports. A janitor had allegedly spotted the woman in the bathroom cleaning up water and dog food from the stall’s floor.

The employee subsequently found the dog’s carcass in a trash container and reported the grim discovery to a supervisor.
 
What a vile woman. How can anyone kill an animal, let alone your own dog. Absolutely awful
 
So she basically just got a slap on the wrist for being a cruel b.. Karma is one of those too and she's coming for her.
I don't think she has plead guilty or accepted a plea deal. She just posted bond and was released from jail. She will either need to plead guilty of not guilty. If not guilty than a trial. Then if found guilty sentencing.

The charge she is charged with is Aggravated Animal Cruelty, which is a third degree felony.

I wonder if she was allowed to leave the county as part of her bond conditions.

Given the callousness of the crime, I think she will be looking at substantial jail (prison) time.

Hopefully the judge loves animals and is not allergic to dogs.

JMO


828.12 Cruelty to animals.—
(1) A person who unnecessarily overloads, overdrives, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance or shelter, or unnecessarily mutilates, or kills any animal, or causes the same to be done, or carries in or upon any vehicle, or otherwise, any animal in a cruel or inhumane manner, commits animal cruelty, a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or by a fine of not more than $5,000, or both.
(2) A person who intentionally commits an act to any animal, or a person who owns or has the custody or control of any animal and fails to act, which results in the cruel death, or excessive or repeated infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering, or causes the same to be done, commits aggravated animal cruelty, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or by a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
(a) A person convicted of a violation of this subsection, where the finder of fact determines that the violation includes the knowing and intentional torture or torment of an animal that injures, mutilates, or kills the animal, shall be ordered to pay a minimum mandatory fine of $2,500 and undergo psychological counseling or complete an anger management treatment program.
(b) A person convicted of a second or subsequent violation of this subsection shall be required to pay a minimum mandatory fine of $5,000 and serve a minimum mandatory period of incarceration of 6 months. In addition, the person shall be released only upon expiration of sentence, is not eligible for parole, control release, or any form of early release, and must serve 100 percent of the court-imposed sentence. Any plea of nolo contendere shall be considered a conviction for purposes of this subsection.
(3) A person who commits multiple acts of animal cruelty or aggravated animal cruelty against an animal may be charged with a separate offense for each such act. A person who commits animal cruelty or aggravated animal cruelty against more than one animal may be charged with a separate offense for each animal such cruelty was committed upon.
(4) A veterinarian licensed to practice in the state shall be held harmless from either criminal or civil liability for any decisions made or services rendered under the provisions of this section. Such a veterinarian is, therefore, under this subsection, immune from a lawsuit for his or her part in an investigation of cruelty to animals.
(5) A person who intentionally trips, fells, ropes, or lassos the legs of a horse by any means for the purpose of entertainment or sport commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. As used in this subsection, the term “trip” means any act that consists of the use of any wire, pole, stick, rope, or other apparatus to cause a horse to fall or lose its balance, and the term “horse” means any animal of any registered breed of the genus Equus, or any recognized hybrid thereof. This subsection does not apply when tripping is used:
(a) To control a horse that is posing an immediate threat to other livestock or human beings;
(b) For the purpose of identifying ownership of the horse when its ownership is unknown; or
(c) For the purpose of administering veterinary care to the horse.
(6) In addition to other penalties prescribed by law, a person who is convicted of a violation of this section may be prohibited by the court from owning, possessing, keeping, harboring, or having custody or control over any animal for a period of time determined by the court.
History.—s. 4, ch. 4971, 1901; GS 3395; RGS 5244; CGL 7363; s. 2, ch. 70-50; s. 4, ch. 71-12; s. 949, ch. 71-136; s. 1, ch. 82-116; s. 2, ch. 89-194; s. 5, ch. 94-339; s. 1286, ch. 97-102; s. 26, ch. 99-391; s. 35, ch. 2000-308; s. 1, ch. 2002-51; s. 1, ch. 2013-245; s. 2, ch. 2018-87.

 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
528
Total visitors
650

Forum statistics

Threads
625,627
Messages
18,507,158
Members
240,826
Latest member
rhannie88
Back
Top