<modsnip - fundraising and wishlist discussion not allowed>
It could be as easy as the grocery store where the employee said the wife shopped for years and years offered to deliver their groceries once a week for a month - they don't have to donate the groceries, just drive them to the house. It doesn't need to complicated, imo. She doesn't need to be housebound, but I myself would want to lay low until at least the press moves on to something else. If there is nothing to report at the house, the press won't stick around. But watching the wife walk to the grocery store is a photo op - so starve them of that opportunity for awhile.
jmo
Right, I wasn't talking about donating the groceries, just making it easier for her to carry more at a time. My grandmother had a little cart that was kind of like a dolly with baskets for groceries and I just got one through my product testing that is for garden or groceries or whatever with heavy duty wheels for mixed terrain. That way she doesn't have to go out as often. But I know she herself has mobility issues, so maybe the cart would be too much for her to carry. I have issues like that myself, but I live in the boonies, I can't even get to the store anymore if I try to walk but I'm at the bottom of a huge hill. So I understand not being able to get all the groceries at once or having to go out multiple times a week just to get the basics. It's an already hard situation made harder by people lurking everywhere to grab pictures and videos of this poor family. It's stressful and confusing and disheartening for these poor people. -IMO
But I do agree that delivery would be the most charitable and viable option. I agree that starving the paparazzi is the best option here. I just wish it was a non-issue. I wasn't caught up so I didn't want to reply to messages so far back when people were talking about their privacy. People mentioned that if no money was made, if people didn't pay attention then it would die off. But the problem is the paparazzi and others like them, they will always push to the ultimate boundaries because the news and tabloids will always pay for those videos and pictures. It has to stop at their level.
The family absolutely deserves peace, time, and to heal from this. Unfortunately, the healing may not come until after trial and all the hoopla is done because how can they really move on until it's 'done'? Which let's face it, is it really ever? But the fact that they are pestering a family with a special needs child is despicable and beyond contemptible. People should be ashamed. But they figure, most likely that it's a kind of collateral damage, that whether they knew or not, they're associated, so that makes them part of the 'circus'. It isn't fair or right for them.
But this is my opinion, would we know or be speculating as much if we didn't know what we know about the family as well? How the family lived, the fact that they aren't involved. Think of the fact that we have discussed here how she has reacted, what she's done since, how she is managing now. We're even discussing her now with the way the house is in disarray etc. So in a way, as intrusive and awful as they are, and granted, we don't need pictures to go with them but those articles do provide a bit of insight into the entire picture so that we can sympathize but also make more deductions about the alleged killer, her husband. It really is a double edged sword here. In my very very humble opinion
(And I'm very sorry if anything I say isn't allowed. I have been making mistakes in my posts and I apologize profusely for it)