hi Dave,
I apologize if my style of communication offended you,
It wasn't your style that bothered me. It was this one thing. But it's no problem. I figured you wouldn't back-bite me on purpose. I hated to put you on the spot like I did, and I'm sorry too, for doing that. But it just struck me as so odd. I couldn't imagine where you were coming from.
So, far as I go, it's cool between us.
my intent wasn't to offend, was to emphasize that typically, if a mother finds out that her kindergarten daughter was being sexually abused, it seems to me she would confront the adult responsible, but I recognize this is a pretty unusual case.
Well, my response to that is multi-layered, voynich.
1) As I said before, you'd think that. But more often than not, the mother blames the victim. Marilyn Van Derbur knows. It happened to her.
2) More specific to this case, it's unusual because you have unusual people.
And that is part and parcel to my whole construct.
3) What's more, I wasn't suggesting that this took place in a vacuum. My way of thinking is that PR was already at the end of her rope mentally that day, and she hears this. You've heard the expression, "the straw that broke the camel's back." Well, this was not a straw, it was a barbell!
More than that, you've mentioned false memories several times, voynich. Where I'm from we call that "putting ideas in someone's head." Within the context of my theory, PR didn't flip because she thought JB was telling the truth; she flipped because she thought JB was lying. Maybe that helps clear it up.
If RDI is true, then the R's won the get out of jail card lottery with the DNA and LE missteps.
And a WHOLE lot of money. You might not know this, but the PIs working for the Rs actually tried to railroad a document examiner into prison because he named PR as the RN writer. That's a story for later, though.
I did state that I think PR-only among RDI (possibly BDI) seems to me to be more plausible.
I don't have a problem with that, voynich. But I just can't get past the whole vaginal injuries issue. That's where I'm coming from.
And I've stated that if PR+JR, there are problems along the lines that JR would not allow PR to write such an RN, PR and JR may not fully cooperate or tell contradictory statements, etc.
I get you. But to me, my way is the only way I can reconcile the greatest amount of evidence in my mind. That's why I always preface it with a disclaimer, because as far as I know, it's my theory and mine alone.
I did state in the post immediately before
I sensed a great disturbance in the Force
I feel my most impressive detective work to date is outing SD as a Dark Lord of the Sith.
If I had known this I probably would have called myself SithSlayer rather than voynich.
I remember!
I did address you as my little green friend.
I haven't been "little" since I was five!
Can we be Sith Lord-Jedi Master friends again? If so, I'll let you experience the full power of the Dark Side. (evil laff)
Again? As far as I go, we always were! I just wanted to know where you were coming from.
