SOLVED MA - Jane Britton, 22, Harvard student, Cambridge, 7 Jan 1969

I received a reply from Cambridge PD:

I received your request regarding the status of the case of Jane Britton. Your best bet would be to contact the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office. They should be able to help you.

Middlesex District Attorney’s Office
15 Commonwealth Avenue
Woburn, MA 01801

Main Phone: (781) 897-8300

Thank you,
Criminal Investigations Division
Cambridge Police Department


** I am at work, would anyone want to call Middlesex County DA??
 
Rhino: On the phone with them now....

Edit: Have made contact with person in the records department at the Middlesex DA who is willing to work with me. I would ask that no one else contact at this time, so that no one gets annoyed by getting a ton of calls which may put them off on getting information....

Also, I contacted Kent state library and requested a copy of the picture from the Borowitz crime photograph collection...they will get back to me....

I will keep you updated!
~T
 
Rhino: On the phone with them now....

Edit: Have made contact with person in the records department at the Middlesex DA who is willing to work with me. I would ask that no one else contact at this time, so that no one gets annoyed by getting a ton of calls which may put them off on getting information....

Also, I contacted Kent state library and requested a copy of the picture from the Borowitz crime photograph collection...they will get back to me....

I will keep you updated!
~T

Thank you, T!
 
Edit: Have made contact with person in the records department at the Middlesex DA who is willing to work with me.
~T

This is extremely awesome, T. Really eager to see what comes of this. Thank you!

Galligan -- what I have observed, he's the guy most often 'quoted' when misinformation (as cleared up by Don M. ) is present in reports.
 
From Kent State Library Borowitz Collection:

Jane Britton Jan 7, 1969 copy.jpg
 
Rhino: On the phone with them now....

Edit: Have made contact with person in the records department at the Middlesex DA who is willing to work with me. I would ask that no one else contact at this time, so that no one gets annoyed by getting a ton of calls which may put them off on getting information....

Also, I contacted Kent state library and requested a copy of the picture from the Borowitz crime photograph collection...they will get back to me....

I will keep you updated!
~T

many thanks, T! (also, I finally got around to looking up bibliotaph...more thanks for adding to my vocabulary--there are a few people in my life that fit this description)
 
From Kent State Library Borowitz Collection:

View attachment 54959

It's good to see that this is the "crime scene" photograph people have mentioned. I had a hard time believing that it would be literally of the crime scene.

The door in the picture is the door across the landing from my place and Jane's place. In other words, to get to her place a person would go up the stairs that the guys are going down, turn left, and straight ahead would be my door. Turn left again, go down a very short hall, and you'd be in front of Jane's door.
 
It's probably considered sleuthing noninvolved parties.
 
A lot of things in Jane's apartment could really only be fully understood by people in her field. (from what we've been told via media) I believe they brought in an expert/experts to help. I wonder if it would be helpful to have someone new go over these items again?
 
MOD NOTE: Questions and comments about a moderator's decision are to be addressed to the moderator in a private message.

Further, per TOS, we respect the privacy of individuals who have not been named in the media in association with a particular case.

Is it really that hard to snip a name down to initials?

Attacking WS Moderators & Administrators:

Posting a thread to comment on, question, or criticize moderator or administrator action is not appropriate in a public forum. Please utilize the board’s Private Message function, or email, staff if you wish to discuss these issues. As long as you bring up your concerns maturely and civilly to the moderator or administrator in question, we will do our best to address your concerns fairly and promptly.

Here are the “Dos” and “Don’ts” of addressing your concerns to moderators or administrators:

Do be civil and polite. Bring up your concerns in a mature and respectful manner. If you are contacting us because you violated forum guidelines, be adult enough to admit your mistake. If your ID has been locked for some reason, talking politely to us about it in private, via e-mail or private message, can get your ID reinstated in many cases.

Do not be derogatory or insulting towards us. You will not get what you want by name calling or bashing us.

All we ask is that you treat us the way you would want us to treat you. If you treat us with respect, we will do the same for you.

Realize that a lot goes on behind the scenes. If you are thinking to yourself "Those moderators are either total idiots or they know something I do not", it's safe to assume we know something you do not.


*This post is for the benefit of all, and intended for no one in particular.
 
Im starting to get the feeling that I shouldn't be very hopeful in getting a response......So, I guess the question is...what now?
 
Hi folks,
New to the site and I think I have some information relative to this case, info completely ignored by the Cambridge Police Dept. In 1976 Richard M. Gramly, an archaeologist/geologist/Indian grave looter that graduated from Harvard and was enrolled in their anthropology department when Jane Britton was murdered, was involved in another cold case, that of Anne Abraham. I've attached a link for your convenience: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=bfwtAAAAIBAJ&sjid=cYgFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1101,2689266&hl=en

Ann Abraham, was an attractive young aspiring archaeologist that was paired with Gramly on a Smithsonian funded expedition to Labrador. Her body was never found. It was surmised she became the victim of a polar bear, though in the intensive search for her, the helicopter pilots reported seeing no such predators. Gramly is an expert of ancient Persian lithics, and of course an ancient stone axe was used to murder Bitton, at least according to the reports. Gramly has had a checkered life, having been forbidden by the state to conduct archaeological investigations in New York as he violated provisions of NAGPRA (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act). It is reported that he had skull cap ashtrays and body part adornments throughout his office, and I have included a link for this as well: http://www.ag.ny.gov/press-release/landmark-settlement-protects-native-burial-site
His name once again surfaced recently in the news involving an FBI investigation of another Indian grave looter/body part collector: http://www.vocativ.com/culture/art-culture/indianas-real-indiana-jones/
Question, has anyone made this link and/or explored this? There are whispered rumors in the archaeological community that Gramly was interested in both deceased young women. Please let me know what you think, as these two women and their families deserve justice, and this guy fits the m.o.
 
Hi folks,
New to the site and I think I have some information relative to this case, info completely ignored by the Cambridge Police Dept. In 1976 Richard M. Gramly, an archaeologist/geologist/Indian grave looter that graduated from Harvard and was enrolled in their anthropology department when Jane Britton was murdered, was involved in another cold case, that of Anne Abraham. I've attached a link for your convenience: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=bfwtAAAAIBAJ&sjid=cYgFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1101,2689266&hl=en

Ann Abraham, was an attractive young aspiring archaeologist that was paired with Gramly on a Smithsonian funded expedition to Labrador. Her body was never found. It was surmised she became the victim of a polar bear, though in the intensive search for her, the helicopter pilots reported seeing no such predators. Gramly is an expert of ancient Persian lithics, and of course an ancient stone axe was used to murder Bitton, at least according to the reports. Gramly has had a checkered life, having been forbidden by the state to conduct archaeological investigations in New York as he violated provisions of NAGPRA (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act). It is reported that he had skull cap ashtrays and body part adornments throughout his office, and I have included a link for this as well: http://www.ag.ny.gov/press-release/landmark-settlement-protects-native-burial-site
His name once again surfaced recently in the news involving an FBI investigation of another Indian grave looter/body part collector: http://www.vocativ.com/culture/art-culture/indianas-real-indiana-jones/
Question, has anyone made this link and/or explored this? There are whispered rumors in the archaeological community that Gramly was interested in both deceased young women. Please let me know what you think, as these two women and their families deserve justice, and this guy fits the m.o.

Thanks for the interesting tidbits and welcome to Ws Scrutin-eyes!
 
I was aware of all this, but wasn't sure whether it was OK to reveal anything about it. I didn't know RMG and I'll say that RMG isn't my prime suspect, but that means nothing.

I can say that when I learned about RMG (in 1979) I forwarded that information to Lt. Joyce. I told him that the people who told me about RMG did not know whether he was in Cambridge at the time of the murder, or whether he knew or kept company at all with Jane. What Lt. Joyce did or didn't do with that information is, as usual, unavailable.

There was an article in Smithsonian Magazine, sometime later in the 1970s. It seems as though the Smithsonian Magazine's archives are not online, but I'm sure some libraries must have a collection.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
153
Guests online
618
Total visitors
771

Forum statistics

Threads
626,415
Messages
18,526,026
Members
241,040
Latest member
Mollgirl
Back
Top