- Joined
- Jul 15, 2014
- Messages
- 30,175
- Reaction score
- 294,621
I probably have it mixed up with another case. Sorry I mentioned it without checking.That's the first time I hear about Jacob being raised by grandma.
jmopinion
I probably have it mixed up with another case. Sorry I mentioned it without checking.That's the first time I hear about Jacob being raised by grandma.
my bold.The judge wants to keep her at Rikers until she cooperates but that may not phase her. She was a single parent, in low income housing and appeared to be having trouble even caring for herself. She didn't have electricity at the well check and reports are that her apartment was unkempt.
Perhaps, in her case, this won't promote her cooperation.
There could have been a financial barrier here (insurance often won't approve 100% of the cost of a wheelchair) or it could be due to a lack of medical care. It sounds like Jacob had never been seen by a doctor, at least not recently, so I HIGHLY doubt he ever saw someone who could prescribe him a wheelchair/larger stroller if he needed one.Thirdly, that she has been allegedly said to have been pushing him around on strollers. True, it could be, that this little angel boy had more issues that we knew (or anyone else.). But even then, he would had been provided the right size of wheelchair or in some cases, actual strollers. Otherwise it could be once again, some version of doll play.
Rikers is notorious for being awful in many ways - a dearth of food, dirty, not kept up. A lot of abuse and violence. I keep remembering the teenage boy who died there because he was accused of stealing a backpack. I suspect if she acclimates, it will be more because her mental health is so poor that she doesn’t fully understand what is happening around her.my bold.
Agreed. Seems to me, she'll be getting 3 free meals a day, a clean bed, shower, etc. She may like it there, at least for a while. Grrrrr.
Thanks for clearing for me bit more how insurance plays part in all of this. I only knew some about the disability services through few of my friends, but in regards of getting better strollers and wheelchairs, I admit not knowing that much.There could have been a financial barrier here (insurance often won't approve 100% of the cost of a wheelchair) or it could be due to a lack of medical care. It sounds like Jacob had never been seen by a doctor, at least not recently, so I HIGHLY doubt he ever saw someone who could prescribe him a wheelchair/larger stroller if he needed one.
Autism and physical disabilities can co-occur a lot, but given that Jacob was severely neglected and very small for his age, IMO I think the likely explanation is that he was too weak to walk significant distances. Just speculation on my part, there's no way to know for sure until the mom talks and it doesn't sound like she will any time soon.
I think you have him confused with Jayden Spicer.Wasn't he raised by his grandmother until she passed away? I might be mis-remembering or mixing up with another case, but I suspect the grandmother's death triggered this downward spiral.
jmo
www.nydailynews.com
legalclarity.org
I once heard a family court judge explain it to a defendant as "In criminal court, they aren't supposed to assume you're guilty because you plead the 5th, but in family court I am allowed to make that inference."Here is an article supposedly claiming to differentiate the difference between pleading the 5th in family court as opposed to criminal court. But I couldn't really discern the difference. Tossing it out here.
![]()
Can You Plead the Fifth in Family Court?
Invoking your Fifth Amendment right in family court is a complex choice. Your silence can protect you from criminal charges but may harm your civil case.legalclarity.org
I can see how that would relate to a financial matter or something not relating to the whereabouts and or death or concealment of a minor child. Based on her charges I agree that the family court can't keep her locked away indefinitely. What other options are there in a case like this?I once heard a family court judge explain it to a defendant as "In criminal court, they aren't supposed to assume you're guilty because you plead the 5th, but in family court I am allowed to make that inference."