- Joined
- Dec 17, 2008
- Messages
- 9,218
- Reaction score
- 41,771
Some times judges do use common sense & think of the victims, not just the perps!...I wish I could copy/paste the entire article as it's so short...but suffice it to say, the convicted felon's insistence that his sick "fantasizies" (minor girls' faces that had been photoshopped onto adult bodies) "didn't actually hurt children" did *not* fly! The judges didn't buy his b.s. argument! :rocker:
While there was no evidence Hotaling distributed the images, the three judges say they showed six identifiable girls, putting them at risk of psychological harm and damage to their reputations.
more here
http://www.benningtonbanner.com/stories/us-appeals-court-upholds-child-porn-sentence,245268
While there was no evidence Hotaling distributed the images, the three judges say they showed six identifiable girls, putting them at risk of psychological harm and damage to their reputations.
more here
http://www.benningtonbanner.com/stories/us-appeals-court-upholds-child-porn-sentence,245268
