Identified! OR - Multnomah Co., UnsFem UP11085, 17-23, tag stating "Case E", Jan'80 - N/A

Romulus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
3,654
Reaction score
5,696
The Doe Network


http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/1259ufor.html
No_Image_Available_female.jpg




Unidentified Female

Date of Discovery: January 1, 1980
Location of Discovery: Multnomah County, Oregon
Estimated Date of Death: Unknown
State of Remains: Not recognizable - Partial skeletal parts only
Cause of Death: Unknown
Physical Description

** Listed information is approximate

Estimated Age: 17-23 years old
Race: Unknown
Gender: Female
Height: 5'7" to 5'9"
Weight: Unknown
Hair Color: Unknown
Eye Color: Unknown
Distinguishing Marks/Features: Epiphyseal fusion incomplete on femur, humerus and superior iliac margin.
Dentals: Not available.
Fingerprints: Not available.
DNA: Sample available - Not yet submitted.
Clothing & Personal Items

Clothing: None.
Jewelry: None.
Additional Personal Items: None.
Case History

The skeletal remains of a young female were discovered archived at the Medical Examiner's facility. The only documentation included with the remains was a yellow fabric tag stating, "Case E."
Investigating Agency(s)

If you have any information about this case please contact;Agency Name: Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
Agency Contact Person: Dr. Veronica Vance
Agency Phone Number: 503-251-2402
E-Mail
Agency Case Number: 13-11085
NCIC Case Number: N/A
NamUs Case Number: UP #11085
Please refer to this number when contacting any agency with information regarding this case.
Information Source(s)

NamUs
 
So they were discovered in 1980 but could have been archived years, possibly decades, before that? I'm kind of confused by the circumstances. What's your take on it?
Also, if the epiphyseal fusion is incomplete on femur - does that mean she wasn't done growing? I recall hearing about that in Bio, but that was eons ago.
 
I'm guessing an insider would know if the yellow colored tag meant anything special. (Or it could mean the tag was yellowed from age as some fabric yellows over time.)

My ex grew up in Portland (he was born in 1962)....according to him the hard partying 1960s scenes that made San Francisco, CA famous were happening in Portland too. These remains might be from a transient, or possibly of Native American origin.
 
Yes Alleykins, I believe that the presence of an epiphyseal growth plate rather than a completed line on long bones means that she wasn't finished growing and was likely on the younger end of the age estimate (under 18-20, when the average person's growth is matured from adolescent to adult structures). I also think that what happened here was that this was likely a case of previously misplaced/lost archived remains that were eventually rediscovered who knows how much time later after they were initially found and stored with the ME.
 
Yes Alleykins, I believe that the presence of an epiphyseal growth plate rather than a completed line on long bones means that she wasn't finished growing and was likely on the younger end of the age estimate (under 18-20, when the average person's growth is matured from adolescent to adult structures). I also think that what happened here was that this was likely a case of previously misplaced/lost archived remains that were eventually rediscovered who knows how much time later after they were initially found and stored with the ME.

bbm for focus
That's what I'm leaning toward, that the discovery date wasn't when the remains were initially discovered, but found in archives, which means they could be somewhat older. Could they have been used for training purposes maybe?
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
63
Guests online
803
Total visitors
866

Forum statistics

Threads
625,994
Messages
18,516,337
Members
240,904
Latest member
nexy9522
Back
Top