- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 8,684
- Reaction score
- 4,692
Don't you think it's possible, even likely that LE and the FBI are privy to where the money went hence their comments that they found no money missing?
Not without a forensic audit.
Don't you think it's possible, even likely that LE and the FBI are privy to where the money went hence their comments that they found no money missing?
I also think he kept his daughter living quit comfortable through college and had several fairly expensive trips, pap for a Mini, and paid off PFs house.
I also think he kept his daughter living quit comfortable through college and had several fairly expensive trips, pap for a Mini, and paid off PFs house.
Well, I've what PEF and LG wear and it isn't exactly ermine.
As for antiques, "collectables might be a better term. He liked old camera's and toys from his childhood. Further, he didn't have a huge amount of space to keep large collections.
Well, a few things to remember.
1. RFG was not a single parent. LG had a mother who likely making more than RFG (based on full professor at Smeal's average salary). Even spending it all on his daughter would be indicative.
2. RFG was, by his own account, planning to retire from both the DA's Office and the practice of law. Why isn't, or hasn't, he saved up for retirement?
Laughing....doesn't have to be ermine. Designer clothes aren't all that obvious. I wore Chanel and nobody guessed. They were quite understated. Just looked like a regular suit. Seriously.
The show at pressers wearing sweatshirts.![]()
pension......pension. That is why he worked for the government. If he lived as modestly as is claimed then it would have been enough. House and car paid off....sounds like retirement planning to me.
Still laughing, Chanel makes sweatshirts and jeans too. I had some.
Can I just say how much I've enjoyed (and learned from) reading this thread? I'm originally from Philly and do remember reading about this. I'm an emotional person (very, at times), but as a nurse you just get on with things anyway and focus. For that reason I tend to avoid the overwrought, hand-wringing threads. I appreciate how clear and focused some of you have been here and look forward to learning more. Thanks, guys!
Not without a forensic audit.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.