I think that's a good possibility, having everything buttoned up tight.
Things could change between his pleas and his sentencing. Perhaps a lot. The judge has lattitude and leverage with the sentencing, and what if some of the reasons for his decisions are based on evidence under the gag order/NDO, and were not included in the charges read out and BT's overview?
Also, what if the victims' parents, who all appear to have different perspectives on the pleas, and the Life In Prison (LIP, saying it this way since I'm not sure about no parole being a given) versus the DP, implore the judge to hand out a different type of sentence for their own child versus the others?
IANAL, and don't even know if that's something that could come up, but if one set of parents feels the options for sentencing since the guilty plea aren't "enough" (e.g., they are still set on the DP, and 4 fixed life sentences [& 10 years for burglary] all served consecutively are "inadequate" or "unacceptable") could they ask the judge to consider a more severe sentence for their child? Like isolation in maximum security, no gen pop, bare minimum privileges, no visitors and/or communications with the outside world, that kind of thing?
Don't even know if that's a thing, I know convicts in ID have their rights by law, but could an exception be made in this case due to the heinousness of a quadruple murder of young people in their beds/home and/or to appease any of the victims' parents?
Also, not to go too far down the rabbit hole on the sentencing options (though I guess I am) but I've wondered about them in terms of any federal aspects that could be overarching coming into play?
JMO