- Joined
- Jan 24, 2024
- Messages
- 1,526
- Reaction score
- 12,061
I am not putting the individual in question aside, and perhaps it's a question of mercy. <modsnip: Name calling not allowed> has been given much mercy by the system. He could have arguably been convicted twenty times over with the stockpile of evidence the state had against him. Yet, he was permitted to retain his own life, despite depriving four innocent young people of their lives. And he received great mercy in his plea deal, despite protestations from some victims' family members.Just stepping aside from the individual in question, I actually have a real problem with this staff member not facing some kind of charge. The cameras are there for safety. The prisoner does not have any control or veto for them being there. They film them all the time - sleeping, dressing, using the toilet. The duty of care breach is one I find disgusting. I don't care who the subject was or what he did - I care that someone exploited that position of power for money. And they're not getting any consequences for it. If you did it in a school, in a hospital, in a public bathroom, you'd be charged. But it's an inmate, oh, never mind?
MOO
The person who committed this wrong in question did not leave four people in pools of blood. The punishment has fit the arguable crime, that may be the thinking behind this.
So this person also received mercy. The individual did not technically commit a crime; I've seen no indication of payment, I personally don't think it matters, but all jmo.
The quality of mercy is not strained, so they say. It certainly wasn't with the inmate, so to me, it's no wonder it has not been strained with this individual.
Last edited by a moderator:
