- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,370
- Reaction score
- 703,045
I think it would be VERY risky to go to trial now.it is completely bizarre... honestly they should have let the people decide DP or no DP based on mitigating or aggravating circumstances. although he claims to be on the spectrum and having certain issues and disabilities, I still think his level of functionality is quite high and he also fit enough to kill 4 young healthy people in a single go, so mitigation seems scarce..like almost non-existent.
Visual Snow? not really a mitigation factor either..like saying you can't give me the DP because I have tinnitus...
I think it was disgraceful and I was not satisfied. I hope somehow it all gets reversed and sent to a jury trial. mOO
So many uncertainties. There was a minefield the prosecution needed to move through.
---The DNA admission into evidence could implode.
---And the two survivors, not calling 911 until noon the next day? They would have been really poor witnesses during cross examination, imo.
---And there were potential questions about the phone and the cell towers because it moved through areas with no cell coverage, leaving the defense free to fill in the gaps themselves.
I was nervous about the trial as it was approaching. I think the confession was a very lucky thing to happen just in time. IMO