Now the the livestream is complete, you can access on YT the transcript of the AP video of the stream.
--I do hope we find how they ascertained he parked behind and above. DD driver? Someone in that apartment complex glancing out?
--Prosecutor: "We will not represent that he intended to commit all of the murders that he did
that night."
--Prosecutor: "the defendant's car was seized and it was actually pretty much disassembled internally, and it also had been cleaned. There was a bucket of cleaner right beside it. " (note: not clear to me if BT meant that the car was taken in and disassembled in a search for evidence, which we know they did do, or if he meant that when they initially looked in the car it was in that state. Because BT does jump around a bit, I suspect the disassembled referred to how the car was analyzed by FBI/LE).
This part jumped out at me, and I'm so so so curious:
Hippler: I want to also make for the record
the defendant has provided with the
guilty plea advisory form
a document entitled "written factual basis" that purports to have the defendant's signature dated 1 July 2025. Did you sign that document?
BK: Yes.
Hippler: And did you agree with the written factual basis that is included there?
BK: Yes.
Now, the judge termed what the prosecutor was then going to present to the court verbally as "its recitation of its factual basis had this case gone to trial."
So...is BK the author of the "written factual basis" document that he signed and was returned to the judge along with his guilty plea advisory questionnaire? Or was it a document written by the prosecution that contained basically what Brian Thompson presented in today's hearing as a recitation of the factual basis, and then BK signed it as being true?