Russia Attacks Ukraine - 23 Feb 2022 #13

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ukraine gets first funds from UK secured by Russian assets, Kyiv says​

Ukraine has received its first set of funding from the UK via a scheme which uses the profits from Russian assets held in Europe, according to Ukraine's prime minister.

Posting on X this morning, Denys Shmyhal says this payment will be put towards "strengthening Ukraine's defence capabilities".

"We expect all sovereign assets of the Russian Federation to be confiscated and transferred to benefit our country in the future," the prime minister adds.

Shymhal thanks his UK counterpart Keir Starmer as well as wider G7 partners "for the mechanism to make Russian money work for Ukraine".

The initiative was announced by the UK government last October and will form the country's contribution to a wider £38bn ($50bn) fund announced in June by members of the G7 group of leading economies.

WHAT???? UK didn't use their own money ???? UNBELIEVABLE

Did UK give any of their OWN money? They just took the assets. So basically UK NOT giving any of their own money. How crooked can you get? What a cheep trick.

The US gave taxpayer dollars. It was ALL OUR OWN money. We didn't take money from someone else and give it to Ukraine.

I can not believe this !! This is clearly a violation of international law and will impact the UK banking system with foreign investors.

The money was frozen, this does not mean UK can give it away. There are international banking laws. There are legal proceedings in order to sell seized assets. They just chose to disregard those?

I certainly don't care for Russia. I don't condone what they're doing in Ukraine. I certainly did not condone what UK did.

Just lower my opinion of the UK.

I wonder how Russia is going to retaliate. Glad I'm not in the UK right now.

Buckle up.

Moo....
 
WHAT???? UK didn't use their own money ???? UNBELIEVABLE

You may have missed this part .... "in the future"

imo

Also, the way to do this is as follows ...

The idea would be for a yet-to-be established International Claims Commission to demand reparations from Russia, and if they disagree, to fully seize them, Bloomberg reported citing people familiar with the talks.

 
I think it's quite clear that everything Trump says is bluster and what he's actually doing is assisting Putin to win the war and take over Ukraine.

Trump's stance has always been that he wants this conflict to end in a peace deal. Zelensky purportedly came to DC to sign a minerals deal but instead sabotaged the meeting by rolling his eyes, making faces and arguing that diplomacy wouldnt work. Why was he in DC if he didn't want diplomacy?

After the meeting Zelensky said it would take a very, very long time to agree to a peace deal which signalled to the US that he did not want to end the conflict.

The US is out if he wants to keep fighting. Keith Kellogg said Zelensky was given “fair warning” by the White House before Trump this week ordered a pause on U.S. military assistance and intelligence sharing.

The question is...is Zelensky prepared to negotiate peace with the US on board? Or does he want to keep fighting minus the US?
 
The big thing that France has going for it is its nuclear capabilities. In the eyes of the super-powers.

They are being amazing, and they are probably also acting as a conduit for other nations who want to get satellite and intelligence help to Ukraine (though we'll never know for sure).

Funny they could have done all this three years ago.
 
I haven’t seen any good solutions aside from a push for peace. What’s the end game? What are people hoping for?

No country is going to turn their troops out. imo
Shame on Putin then tbh because someone who has been illegally invaded should not even NEED to negotiate! Nor should the President of America be sucking up to the invader!
 
Trump actually called Putin "Vladimir" in one of those video interviews today - like pals. I think he is an absolute fool sucking up to Putin. Does he not realise what people like Putin are? They would kill their own and stab anyone in the back. JMO

Like he said in the Oval Office, it's unlikely Putin will make a deal if he's treated like crap. It's something called diplomacy. Both sides must agree, not just one.
 
So, who is it that doesn’t want peace?

I did some reading on the ISW link posted by @PommyMommy. One article in particular caught my eye, which I am linking.

It’s written by their Russia expert and discusses the problems with the Minsk II deal and how to avoid them in the next deal. Read it and weep.

“Some peace deals lead to peace, others to more war. The Minsk II deal aimed to end Russia’s limited invasion of Ukraine in 2015 but instead laid the groundwork for the full-scale Russian invasion in 2022. The United States must learn from the Minsk deal or risk a direct Russia-NATO conflict that puts American lives at risk.”

“Another weak deal today would validate Putin’s 2022 full-scale invasion and give Putin hope to gain more over time. Hope for Putin means more war. More war means a larger war: An absolved Russia that bears little or no cost for its invasion will want more and will rebuild its capability to do more. A larger war would mean a higher cost for the United States, risk to American lives, and risk of a catastrophic escalation.

The Trump Administration has a historic opportunity to break Russia’s cycle of overt war and war through “peace” in Ukraine. To do so, the United States must learn the lessons from the Minsk deal:
  1. Russia will seek to transfer the responsibility and cost for its war onto someone else’s balance sheet.
  2. Putin’s demands are stand-ins for his goals – controlling Ukraine and making the United States bend to Putin’s demands to create a world order that favors Russia.
  3. Putin will fight as long as he believes he can outlast the West and Ukraine. Ending the war requires stripping Putin of hope that he can destroy Ukraine as a state in his lifetime — militarily or through a “peace deal.”
  4. Russia can accept failure.”
This is a very long and detailed article, but I would encourage anyone who really wants to understand Russia’s intentions to read it. I am saving this article to refer to as the “peace process” plays out.
Why are you (and the author) directing this at the United States? Although they sometimes use the term “West”. The US has nothing to do with Minsk.

The war between Russia and Ukraine over the Donetsk, Luhansk, and Donbas region has been going on since the split up of the Soviet Union. The Minsk agreements involved those parties. The conflict in that region, between those two nations, has never stopped, won’t stop, and can’t be stopped.The conflict will likely continue well beyond the foreseeable future, regardless of who involves themselves. History since the split up of the USSR has shown this to be true

This has never been a war of Russia against the US. This is not a hill for the US to die on when a likely outcome is World War III - an event which may also lead to a whole new reality for UK, FR, and EU. UK, FR, and EU will look like Gaza

Here is a link to wiki Minsk. Where is the US mentioned at all? Stop trying to goad the US into WW III

Minsk agreements - Wikipedia cease to exist

When you (and/or the obvious warhawk author) says: “Another weak deal..” what do you (or what does he) mean? “Another weak deal” by whom? The US was not part of the “first” “weak deal”.

When the author uses the term “West” he should be using the term Europe. If anybody (other than Ukraine) needs to be sure they don’t negotiate “another weak deal” it is Ukraine, UK, FR, and EU.

The US was not at war with Russia leading up to Minsk, and the US did not negotiate a “weak Minsk deal” that we (while at present still not at war with Russia..) should be sure to avoid making a second time(?) - when we supposedly negotiate with them this time around. This is delusional. The US is not at war with Russia. Stop inserting the US

It is Ukraine and Russia that are at war. Imo, Ukraine and Russia will be engaged in conflict in this region, forever. If the author has a point at all re: any “deal”, it should be directed at Ukraine or the UK, FR, Germany, and EU. What does the US have to do with it? All the US is saying is we can’t keep sending 100 billion a year over there to fund a forever war

“The Trump administration has a historic opportunity to break Russia’s cycle of overt war and war through “peace in Ukraine”. What? Why is the Trump administration even mentioned? Ukraine and Russia are the ones negotiating (or should be). This is a straw man argument

The US is not at war with Russia. Whatever “negotiation” the US is (and has been) doing is to help end a war between Ukraine and Russia that the UK and FR and EU are either incapable or unwilling (or both) of ending. The US cannot fund a forever conflict

It is not the US’s responsibility to fight the Ukrainian - Russian war on behalf of Ukraine. There is no “Minsk” that the US was involved in that we should therefore, looking back, “learn from”. The US is not involved.

In 2022 Joe Biden said the US will not be involved. Nothing has changed. It is not the US’s war. We will not attempt to be keepers of a forever peace, that, even we wanted to and could afford to, is not possible. At all. Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan.

The conflict in this region will never, ever, ever, cease. Even a minimum amount of research on the topic will tell you this. It is like thinking that the Hutu and Tutsi conflict in Africa can somehow be halted and then “backstopped”. It can’t.

What the uber hawkish neoconservative warmongering ISW website erroneously implies is that the US is one of the two parties involved in the conflict in the first place - and therefore needs to avoid making the same mistakes we made last time we negotiated. We made no mistakes last time as we didn’t negotiate last time as we weren't involved last time. This is absurd. It is nothing but a huge logical fallacy. A delusional straw man

The US has tried to help Ukraine and UK and FR and EU. Our efforts have been met with ingratitude and hate. It is not our war, as the current US administration is making clear. Stop attempting to insert the US into a forever war between Ukraine and Russia and risk starting WW III.

Jmo
 
Last edited:
The hype about the Ukrainian rare earths began with Ukrainians themselves. Desperate to find a way to engage Trump, they miscalculated presenting the then-incoming president a “victory plan” in November that talked up — way, way up — the potential of the country’s mineral resources. Soon, they lost control of the narrative.

Ukraine has no significant rare-earth deposits other than small scandium mines. The US Geological Survey, an authority on the matter, doesn’t list the country as holding any reserves. Neither does any other database commonly used in the mining business

One of my besties PHD gave me a crash course in rare minerals in Ukraine over wine and Cheese Doodles the other night.

You are correct USG is not reporting rare minerals. It takes extensive research, drilling, very specific penetrating x-ray type equipment to look to look below the soil surface. She stated research/exploration teams had been to Ukraine an early 2000, for several months. Apparently Ukraine was trying to solicit private investors. They were unable to discover any type of rare mineral or evidence to believe they existed.

No , I don't have a link. She worked for USG her entire career. We grew up together and she moved back when she retired. She can look at a rock and tell you what part of the world it originated in. So many rocks were relocated during the ice age.

She was kind of shocked Trump was going to sign a blind deal, if rare minerals was what he was really after. They do have lots of gas, some oil, lots of coal. I'm wondering if it was a cover to put US people in Ukraine as a deterrent to Russia.
Moo...
 
They aren’t still receiving checks. The rolls have never been purged so those people are still listed but aren’t being sent checks. Keep spreading fake news.
I used to work in Government. We get a lot of refugees from all over the world. Ukraine, Russia, South East Asia, Pakistan, Africa, South America, etc. A lot of them came to Canada without anything - no clothing, no money, no documents. It's very difficult to establish a birthdate for someone who left their home country under duress. And it's not just those situations. There are many rural areas in the world, including Canada and I would suppose the US, where the documentation of births and deaths is through the local church, whatever that may be. We've had people from Saskatchewan who had no birth certificate because the church where the records were kept burned down. So you're looking for some kind of verification of someone's birthdate which can be viewed as a legal document. They can be letters from teachers who taught those kids, notarized by someone. So if that happens in Canada, you can imagine how that anomaly can be magnified a thousandfold for people who came from Uganda, Tanzania, the Philippines, etc, etc. Considering that Social Security started in 1935 in the US that means the earliest someone eligible for payment would have been 1870. And those born in 1870 maybe didn't have a legitimate birth certificate for the very reasons Canada didn't so a date was plugged in to legitimize the date. They could have been born in 1865 or 1871. It just goes to show when you give an individual carte blanche to lay waste to a government data base without knowing some of the idiosyncratic processes they had to go through to level the playing field in terms of giving all Americans access to legitimate payments without supporting documents available you're going to get this type of chaos.
 
Trump actually called Putin "Vladimir" in one of those video interviews today - like pals. I think he is an absolute fool sucking up to Putin. Does he not realise what people like Putin are? They would kill their own and stab anyone in the back. JMO
Back in the '80s Trump pursued business ventures in Russia. Of course, he wanted to put a hotel there. Not surprised. It didn't work out.

He's made no secret, he's known Putin for years. That doesn't make them besties, just acquaintances.

You're never going to be a negotiator my name calling, making derogatory comments. That's certainly not a tactic to encourage someone to the negotiation table.
Moo...
 
Back in the '80s Trump pursued business ventures in Russia. Of course, he wanted to put a hotel there. Not surprised. It didn't work out.

He's made no secret, he's known Putin for years. That doesn't make them besties, just acquaintances.

You're never going to be a negotiator my name calling, making derogatory comments. That's certainly not a tactic to encourage someone to the negotiation table.
Moo...
"You're never going to be a negotiator my name calling, making derogatory comments. That's certainly not a tactic to encourage someone to the negotiation table."

Well he called Zelensky a Dictator and accused him of trying to start WW3. That is hardly diplomatic negotiation either.
 
Back in the '80s Trump pursued business ventures in Russia. Of course, he wanted to put a hotel there. Not surprised. It didn't work out.

He's made no secret, he's known Putin for years. That doesn't make them besties, just acquaintances.

You're never going to be a negotiator my name calling, making derogatory comments. That's certainly not a tactic to encourage someone to the negotiation table.
Moo...

RBBM -- of course it didn't work out, most of his business ventures and hotels don't. See: Atlantic City.
 
Like he said in the Oval Office, it's unlikely Putin will make a deal if he's treated like crap. It's something called diplomacy. Both sides must agree, not just one.
Dictator, imprisoned and is imprisoning imagined 'enemies' of Russia, kills a lot, still has the young girl from USA for donating $50 ish dollars to a fund towards helping Ukraine. 12 years in penal colony. US.Russian citizen, was visiting family. Murderer of many in Russia and who has reached in UK. KGB. On and on. Oh, and invaded and slaughtered Ukranian citizens in homes, hospitals, schools and at this time. Treat him like crap.
 
RBBM -- of course it didn't work out, most of his business ventures and hotels don't. See: Atlantic City.

Sydney, Australia, wouldn't let him build a casino there in the 80s - due to his mafia connections, and his failed Atlantic City ventures. He wasn't considered a good, upstanding person to do business with.

imo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
174
Guests online
529
Total visitors
703

Forum statistics

Threads
625,617
Messages
18,507,000
Members
240,824
Latest member
ChestnutRice&ChainsawMan
Back
Top