- Joined
- May 28, 2024
- Messages
- 503
- Reaction score
- 3,061
Riddle me this.
What does it say when a young, strong, sporty electrical apprentice who is into IT and has a telecommunications technician father, and who would know better, carries a traceable, intact and working smart phone on them, and away from the scene of the crime?
He could have been asleep in his car with his phone left on, and his phone had pinged
the same time as Samantha was jogging past?
We don't know what the evidence is, and there are a lot of scenarios on what could have happened
What if he were only an accomplice? He's pleaded not guilty
Prosecution needs to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that not only is Samantha dead, but died at the hands of the accused and as a result of deliberate action. Otherwise, it's not murder.