SC - Driver died, officer suspended in connection with DUI arrest, Charleston, Feb 2019

cybervampira

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
15,973
Reaction score
69,051
  • #1
Family: Man died after officer signs form refusing treatment | Daily Mail Online

A drunk driver died from severe internal bleeding after cops took him to the police station rather than hospital after signing a form to say he was refusing medical treatment, his family's attorney claims.

Nathaniel Rhodes, 58, from South Carolina, crashed his van last August resulting in serious internal injuries including eight broken ribs and a ruptured liver, according to medical records. He died in hospital four days after the collision from his injuries.

upload_2019-2-26_0-34-52.jpeg
upload_2019-2-26_0-37-28.jpeg


Now his family are blaming Charleston Police and Charleston County authorities for his death, saying officers delayed Rhodes' medical treatment by booking him into the station before they allowed him to go to hospital.

upload_2019-2-26_0-33-55.jpeg
upload_2019-2-26_0-34-5.jpeg


They say that the arresting officer signed a medical form, which is supposed to be signed by the victim or their guardian, to say that Rhodes was refusing treatment.

upload_2019-2-26_0-34-32.jpeg


The State Law Enforcement Division have launched a probe into the actions of the Charleston officer. The officer has been placed on administrative leave.

Attorneys for Rhodes' family showed a Charleston County jail video of paramedics joking as Rhodes moaned, sounded like he was struggling to breathe and slipped in and out of consciousness.

Cops took man to DUI test, not hospital, after crash, lawyer says. He died days later

Family, attorneys demand answers after death of man who was signed out of EMS care by Charleston police officer

Death of South Carolina DUI suspect raises questions, prompts investigation

Family speaks out after man dies in Charleston Police custody

Police chief suspends officer suspended in connection with DUI arrest of suspect who died days later

 
  • #2
This is messed up on SO many levels- LE is supposed to "protect and serve", if I'm not mistaken. But they thought it was acceptable to sign a refusal of treatment, even though this man had been in a serious car wreck? Then the paramedics are JOKING while this man is bleeding internally??? Where did these so-called "professionals" get educated? As a former EMT, I'm outraged- there are no excuses for any of this. SMH.:mad:
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
135
Guests online
1,577
Total visitors
1,712

Forum statistics

Threads
632,457
Messages
18,627,083
Members
243,162
Latest member
KaseyPlaster
Back
Top