Jayelles
New Member
Hi coralie - I am also from the UK. I started a new thread since you'd made your post in the Member's Theories thread.
I was interested that you'd entitled your theory post "Brother?" because it supports what I've been saying for years about British people who have seen the Tracey documentaries. All we've had in the UK has basically been Michael Tracey's three documentaries - very little other press coverage. Yet it never fails to surprise me how many British people have watched the documentaries and think that JonBenet's brother was involved and that the parents are covering for him! Yet there was nothing about Burke in any of the documentaries.
Regarding the last documentary - it was a complete fraud. I am so angry at the way the British people were fed a misleading parcel of dooby doo. For starters, the "Investigators" around whom the documentary was made were not official investigators but rather som private eyes who had been hired by the ramseys some years ago. They do not have access to the police files.
Then, although these investigators didn't name their "prime suspect" whom they claimed had "disappeared", they did show his arrest documentation and when still framed, it was possible to read the identification number on both documents. It then took 5 minutes to register with the Colorado Criminal Justice place and for $6, obtain copies of the documents which were displayed on the screen. Both documents referred to the same man and it transpired that not only had he not "disappeared" - but that he has an Internet business with up to date contact information. He has a very unusual name and was very easy to find. Some Internet sleuths contacted him and he was very angry to find out that a documentary had been made about the case with him as prime suspect. He hadn't even been in Colorado at the time of the murder and could prove it. He immediately offered to take a DNA test to clear his name but the Boulder DA's office told him he wasn't a suspect.
If the makers of the documentary did NOT knowingly mislead the british public, then they have to have to be among the most incompetent people I've ever come across. For starters - they suggested that the attacker of the little girl in the DAnceWest case (whose father took part in the documentary) was the same person who had killed Jonbenet ramsey (i.e. the "prime suspect" I referred to above) - yet the arrest documents which they showed on the film clearly described this man as having brown hair, brown eyes, 6ft 1inches and aged in his mid fifties. The witness in the Dancewest case (the girl's mother) described her daughter's attacker as being in his twenties, 5ft 6, blonde haired and with a jutting out chin!
You'd think that any thinking person would question the discrepancy here - especially when spending lots of money in making a documentary! Nope - they went ahead and made their film and put it out for the british public to swallow up. The investigators who took part in the film were allowed to state that this man whom they considered to be the prime suspect had "disappeared" whilst all the time they KNEW exactly where he was and how to contact him.
They sold us a pig in a poke. Thankfully, the documentary had to be completely changed before it could air in the States. All references to the "prime suspect" were removed from it - it ended up being a completely different documentary which concentrated instead on the friend who committed suicide and who cannot be connected to the ramseys in any way, shape or form. He's just a convenient fall guy.
All of this is documented and online at FFJ.
Thankfully, the fact that
I was interested that you'd entitled your theory post "Brother?" because it supports what I've been saying for years about British people who have seen the Tracey documentaries. All we've had in the UK has basically been Michael Tracey's three documentaries - very little other press coverage. Yet it never fails to surprise me how many British people have watched the documentaries and think that JonBenet's brother was involved and that the parents are covering for him! Yet there was nothing about Burke in any of the documentaries.
Regarding the last documentary - it was a complete fraud. I am so angry at the way the British people were fed a misleading parcel of dooby doo. For starters, the "Investigators" around whom the documentary was made were not official investigators but rather som private eyes who had been hired by the ramseys some years ago. They do not have access to the police files.
Then, although these investigators didn't name their "prime suspect" whom they claimed had "disappeared", they did show his arrest documentation and when still framed, it was possible to read the identification number on both documents. It then took 5 minutes to register with the Colorado Criminal Justice place and for $6, obtain copies of the documents which were displayed on the screen. Both documents referred to the same man and it transpired that not only had he not "disappeared" - but that he has an Internet business with up to date contact information. He has a very unusual name and was very easy to find. Some Internet sleuths contacted him and he was very angry to find out that a documentary had been made about the case with him as prime suspect. He hadn't even been in Colorado at the time of the murder and could prove it. He immediately offered to take a DNA test to clear his name but the Boulder DA's office told him he wasn't a suspect.
If the makers of the documentary did NOT knowingly mislead the british public, then they have to have to be among the most incompetent people I've ever come across. For starters - they suggested that the attacker of the little girl in the DAnceWest case (whose father took part in the documentary) was the same person who had killed Jonbenet ramsey (i.e. the "prime suspect" I referred to above) - yet the arrest documents which they showed on the film clearly described this man as having brown hair, brown eyes, 6ft 1inches and aged in his mid fifties. The witness in the Dancewest case (the girl's mother) described her daughter's attacker as being in his twenties, 5ft 6, blonde haired and with a jutting out chin!
You'd think that any thinking person would question the discrepancy here - especially when spending lots of money in making a documentary! Nope - they went ahead and made their film and put it out for the british public to swallow up. The investigators who took part in the film were allowed to state that this man whom they considered to be the prime suspect had "disappeared" whilst all the time they KNEW exactly where he was and how to contact him.
They sold us a pig in a poke. Thankfully, the documentary had to be completely changed before it could air in the States. All references to the "prime suspect" were removed from it - it ended up being a completely different documentary which concentrated instead on the friend who committed suicide and who cannot be connected to the ramseys in any way, shape or form. He's just a convenient fall guy.
All of this is documented and online at FFJ.
Thankfully, the fact that
