@txcoastgirl it’s a male tribal thing to take souvenir of deceased humans and animals. Thats why you see deer antlers and stuffed animals in the home of some men or the skulls Aztec warriors would collect of their enemies.
Here are some deep facts I have gathered about this Doe.
1. She was between 5'2-5'3 and she weighed 108 pounds.
2. She was more than likely born between 1964-1966
3. The Police neither confirm or deny they have the killers DNA, which usually means that they do have it.
4. The necklace found on her that hasnt been seen since her murder was probably taken by a police officer or investigator as a souvenir (not uncommon)
5. Just because no one in the prison said the recognized doesnt mean they are telling the truth, especially if they were showing them the postmortem photos.
This could be one of those fake "facts" that accumulate with a case, but my understanding is that she was believed to have been raped by an object, at least partially due to the lack of semen at the scene. If there was a bite mark, it could have been swabbed for saliva, but I'm not sure how common that sort of thing would have been in 1980.
She had raped in multiple orifices with a blunt object. She had not been raped by a genital. I think that conclusion had to have had other sources rather than just the lack of semen.
I assume they did not collect saliva from the bite mark, but they did study the dentals from the bite mark which they compared to Henry Lee Lucas.
I know. I am particularly interested in this one because I have ties to the area and each time I go to my friends ranch, I exit where she was found. As I exit I always look at the location where she was found and wonder who killed her, why and who in the heck was this little girl???She is one of three does I still wanna see identified. The other two being Beth Doe and Princess Doe. I remember I was actually on websleuth when word came that the Sumter County Does had been identified. It felt like I had just won $100. Hope I get to experience the same feeling with her.
I know. I am particularly interested in this one because I have ties to the area and each time I go to my friends ranch, I exit where she was found. As I exit I always look at the location where she was found and wonder who killed her, why and who in the heck was this little girl???
It’s been mentioned multiple times in this thread that DDP haven’t taken it on because another organisation is working her caseI hope DNA Doe Project will take on this one.
It’s been mentioned multiple times in this thread that DDP haven’t taken it on because another organisation is working her case
Hmmm, what do you think @othram ,would this one interest you? I would love to see this young lady get her name back!I just asked Carl and he said that he is unaware of any DNA organization working on her case.
Hmmm, what do you think @othram ,would this one interest you? I would love to see this young lady get her name back!
You all are do absolutely wonderful! Thank you so much!Every case interests us. We will add to the list!
Months ago Margaret Press of DNA Doe Project responded to someone on the DDP facebook page who asked if they could take on WCJD & she responded that "someone else is working her case."
So it's not DDP and it doesn't seem to be Barbara Rae-Venter because Carl Koppelman asked her in a facebook group if she was working on her case, among others, and WCJD was not one of the cases she listed. So could be another group or genealogist.
I just asked Carl and he said that he is unaware of any DNA organization working on her case.
Hello guys,
I remember that a girl that appeared on a still from Rebekah House, singing on a chorus was ruled out.
I enhanced the photo and apparently she has one incisor longer than the other.
I also had that thought, I’m unsure if WCJD had a large incisor.That girl looked IDENTICAL to WCJD. Apparently that girl was too short to plausibly be WCJD but I still have a hard time believing it's not her.