- Joined
- Aug 7, 2018
- Messages
- 545
- Reaction score
- 3,028
We only have the witnesses to go by, but the report I read said her yellow top was "dirty". I was not implying she was a prostitute, but possibly someone might have tried preying on her and buying her shoes. It's sad that none of the items are photographed. And that some of them have gone "missing" from evidence.I do not think this child was a prostitute, as nothing about her appearance or the description of her clothing would suggest that. You are right, the sandals were very popular back then, and a somewhat coveted piece of footwear for a young woman.
I'm holding on her last words (that we know of); "who cares" when asked about parents. That response seems to align with the perceived lack of interest in her disappearance. Maybe no-one did care. I could see this as a situation where maybe she was living with a mother who moved from one boyfriend to the next, and had a slew of personal problems. This child might have been extra baggage.
I predict when we do eventually learn WCJD's identity, she will be the product of a single mother who had too many of her own problems to much notice what was going on with her daughter.
Amateur speculation and opinion
And to me it's weird they have such a wide range for how tall she was. Didn't they measure people for autopsies back then?