- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
- Messages
- 11,402
- Reaction score
- 40,483
Reading hasn't been my strong suit lately.That’s where I got the information
Reading hasn't been my strong suit lately.That’s where I got the information
Yeah I know we discussed her not having a bag for a while. I don’t know how we didn’t see this article. It’s weird that they don’t have it in any of the other descriptions of her clothing.Reading hasn't been my strong suit lately.The link was posted back in thread 2, and I just failed to recognize it was the same article. Thank you!
I agree! It probably won’t help with identification, but it is odd that it’s not mentioned anywhere else. I had forgotten how detailed that article was. Certainly one of the better ones out there.Yeah I know we discussed her not having a bag for a while. I don’t know how we didn’t see this article. It’s weird that they don’t have it in any of the other descriptions of her clothing.
That is the article with the dreadful picture and the details we didn't hear from anywhere else.Took me a minute, but I found it! It would have drove me crazy!
Cold case | Port Aransas South Jetty
Supposedly there are a few photos of the scene. I don’t know at what point they lost the necklace but if they have a photo it doesn’t appear to be online. The shoes are also missing, if I remember correctly.That is the article with the dreadful picture and the details we didn't hear from anywhere else.
The picture appears to be a postmortem photograph with eyes drawn in, not-too-professionally. I just noticed the very thin line of the necklace is visible, maybe even a little bit of the pendant, which makes me wonder if there is a photo somewhere that shows the entire pendant.
I have to address something. Do you remember that nightwind777 guy? Where are the promised facts and revelations? 40 years... it hurts.
Wow, he doesn’t hold back on how he feels about the Sheriff and his associates, definitely some bad blood there. I probably wouldn’t have put their pictures up and called them what he did, but I do think that they either do not care about solving the case and finding WCJD’s identity or they want to solve it all by themselves as they are too proud to request any outside help from Webslueths, Othram, DNA Doe Project etc, etc. MOO.That Nightwind blog did have an update a couple of days ago (November 1) if anyone here is following it. There is some info about this case that you probably won't see anywhere else. You can decide for yourself whether or not it is relevant.
Wow, he doesn’t hold back on how he feels about the Sheriff and his associates, definitely some bad blood there. I probably wouldn’t have put their pictures up and called them what he did, but I do think that they either do not care about solving the case and finding WCJD’s identity or they want to solve it all by themselves as they are too proud to request any outside help from Webslueths, Othram, DNA Doe Project etc, etc. MOO.
No idea about the old thread. I know there are still links to the posts when you search. I know they share the Kathy photo all over fb.Isn't Tammy the reason the old thread got into trouble for sleuthing teenage girls from 1980 who were not reported missing? We should be careful.
That Nightwind blog did have an update a couple of days ago (November 1) if anyone here is following it. There is some info about this case that you probably won't see anywhere else. You can decide for yourself whether or not it is relevant.
This is the first article that clearly asserts the victim was going to visit her *boyfriend* in prison. This is also the first time I am picking up that she got in an old station wagon with three men. Lots in this article...That is the article with the dreadful picture and the details we didn't hear from anywhere else.
The picture appears to be a postmortem photograph with eyes drawn in, not-too-professionally. I just noticed the very thin line of the necklace is visible, maybe even a little bit of the pendant, which makes me wonder if there is a photo somewhere that shows the entire pendant.
I believe it *was* a boyfriend. I'm sure he didn't acknowledge knowing her as there might be statutory rape associated with that admission. The answer to this girls ID is in that prison population. IWT it would be somewhat easy to narrow that down to those in a certain age group?Hmmm... from Cold case | Port Aransas South Jetty
"“She told the waitress she was going to see her boyfriend at Ellis,"
Is it possible WCJD's boyfriend was an employee at Ellis and not an inmate?
Taking this a step further. Clearly, this was her first time to the prison. That leads me to believe her boyfriend was a fairly new resident. That should further narrow down the inmate association. Really, this seems so solvable!I believe it *was* a boyfriend. I'm sure he didn't acknowledge knowing her as there might be statutory rape associated with that admission. The answer to this girls ID is in that prison population. IWT it would be somewhat easy to narrow that down to those in a certain age group?
The answer is there. Of course, for all we know he may be deceased or still incarcerated for other crimes.
Amateur opinion and speculation
If he is a felon, he likely doesn't want the attention, or maybe he just didn't care enough?I like the boyfriend theory...but I wonder why, if true, he hasn't come forward now to ID her?