Identified! TX - Huntsville, 'Walker County Jane Doe', WhtFem 14-16, 91UFTX, Nov'80 Sherry Ann Jarvis

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #3,001
I hope that after WCJD is identified we find out what she was like as a person. After what happened with Marcia King's relatives, I have some doubts that WCJD's loved ones will be generous if they get attacked too.
 
  • #3,002
Walker County Jane Doe looks as if she's younger than 14. I'd say she could most likely be 12 -16
 
  • #3,003
Walker County Jane Doe looks as if she's younger than 14. I'd say she could most likely be 12 -16
I agree with you completely. I put her at 12 or 13. She was just a baby.
 
  • #3,004
I am assuming she was wearing pantyhose with the shoes. I can't believe she would have been walking around without her shoes if she was wearing hose though.
 
  • #3,005
I am assuming she was wearing pantyhose with the shoes. I can't believe she would have been walking around without her shoes if she was wearing hose though.
That’s what makes me think she was with someone at the hitchin post. Had them already off and with her stuff in his vehicle. Or possibly she was not wearing any And he had them
 
  • #3,006
Is it possible the person Jane Doe was going to possibly meet at the Ellis Prison Unit her relative?
 
  • #3,007
BINGO!!

Look at these photos. They are really UNCANNY!

The missing girl is Mary Rodermund, missing since March 2, 1978.
 

Attachments

  • 2610BB98-E7AD-4007-B1CB-A3EBD06F8414.jpeg
    2610BB98-E7AD-4007-B1CB-A3EBD06F8414.jpeg
    40.5 KB · Views: 54
  • F7993D95-B1D0-45CD-ABD2-B3A9D1542674.jpeg
    F7993D95-B1D0-45CD-ABD2-B3A9D1542674.jpeg
    132.4 KB · Views: 34
  • #3,008
BINGO!!

Look at these photos. They are really UNCANNY!

The missing girl is Mary Rodermund, missing since March 2, 1978.
Idk Mary was possibly abducted. There was even a ransom with a phone call from her and her abductor. They do look really similar, though.
 
  • #3,009
Idk Mary was possibly abducted. There was even a ransom with a phone call from her and her abductor. They do look really similar, though.

This idea is really out there, but what if abducted actually meant an older male and female running away, he continues crime and gets convicted. Mary had just turned 16 in 1978.

Mary goes to visit and meets her end? Two years is enough for that to happen.
 
  • #3,010
Mary Bell emailed me after I submitted the tip.
 

Attachments

  • B9AD51FA-1B2C-4191-B596-076F209FD19F.jpeg
    B9AD51FA-1B2C-4191-B596-076F209FD19F.jpeg
    65.8 KB · Views: 45
  • #3,011
Walker County Jane Doe looks as if she's younger than 14. I'd say she could most likely be 12 -16
Oh yea? Why do you say that? I think she looks young but not that young, in my opinion. 16 maybe, but no younger I’d say. I’ve seen the crime scene photo and she looks like woman, not a girl (sorry to be graphic). It could be the perspective though. Again, just my opinion.
 
  • #3,012
I understand how you feel. I recently did a reconstruction of what I think WCJD May have looked like, but it just how I feel.
 

Attachments

  • F9106853-6EA7-4EC6-97F8-076CF5516BDD.jpeg
    F9106853-6EA7-4EC6-97F8-076CF5516BDD.jpeg
    79.7 KB · Views: 42
  • #3,013
  • #3,014
  • #3,015
  • #3,016
Mary’s DNA may have been recently added to NamUs.

I do not know when MLR had her DNA submitted into NamUs, but her DNA was available as of 2016.
 
  • #3,017
I got this from the Doe Network
 

Attachments

  • BA68EA87-A9AC-48E4-A0AF-F112F77DB64B.jpeg
    BA68EA87-A9AC-48E4-A0AF-F112F77DB64B.jpeg
    65.8 KB · Views: 32
  • #3,018
WCJD does *not* look like a woman. Her face is younger and rounder. I don't know why some are so keen to make her seem older.
 
  • #3,019
Mary looks too old to be WCJD IMO, and I don’t see a resemblance when estimating lip to chin, width between eyes, shape of forehead and hairline etc. However, the post Mortem state makes it more difficult. CarlK is the one with the eye. We’ll see what he thinks.
I don’t see a resemblance.

Amateur opinion and speculation.
 
  • #3,020
She definitely looks younger!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
152
Guests online
3,053
Total visitors
3,205

Forum statistics

Threads
632,115
Messages
18,622,301
Members
243,026
Latest member
JC_MacLeod
Back
Top