TX TX - Vidor, near I-10, WhtFem 12-20, 72UFTX (UP4574), Skeletal, previous braces, Jan'84

  • #201
I read the whole thread now. It was started in 2005, now it's 2022! We had two Jane Doe's who turned up to be one and the same, we had a recon of a woman with long thick brown hair, that turned up to be short, fine hair. Making me doubt the info is correct now. In all those years still only 3 official rule outs, but dozens of suggestions and some of them ruled out "of the record". How is LE keeping track op them? We had somebody (@Earth) who tried for 3 years to get LE's attention. This was a child.....why does it feel her file is kind of stuck and catching dust in somebody's desk drawer? Off course there is a possibility that this girl wasn't reported missing, but hé....
 
  • #202
What about Judy Jurgens?

3722DFMN - Judy Gail Jurgens

IMO, she looks like the recon, went to TX with a guy in late 1982 and never came back, and looks to have possibly been wearing braces in the younger photo of her at the link.
Judy IS wearing braces in her younger photo, you're right! There's nothing in Judy's case that's discouraging me to think it's definitely not her (aside from probably her hair being noticeably wavy and Jane's appearing quite straight in the recon), I would say submit it.
 

Attachments

  • Judy Jurgens Alt.png
    Judy Jurgens Alt.png
    490.2 KB · Views: 16
  • #203
@Caring1 Hey could you post the current list of NamUs exclusions for this Jane Doe? I would greatly appreciate it.
 
  • #204
  • #205
Shelley Luty still hasn't been ruled out.
 
  • #206
The 39th year mark since the discovery of Vidor Jane Doe just passed, and her NamUs was recently updated, but no new visible exclusions. I wonder if she's being worked on by genealogists? One can only hope.
 
  • #207
One new exclusion by NamUs:

MP17877
Melody Jones
05/04/1983
Pottawatomie
OK


The other exclusions:

MP18953
Ruth Severance
12/11/1982
Harris
TX

MP1859
Sondra Ramber
10/26/1983
Galveston
TX

MP6429
Julie Moseley
12/23/1974
Tarrant
TX

MP5247
Mindi Chambers
10/19/1982
Maricopa
AZ
 
  • #208

I would still love for LE to find Kelle Fernstrom's remains. Another poster has corresponded with a detective, and Kelle is considered a rule-out as DNA is available for both.

But Kelle is not on the rule-out list, is that right?

 
  • #209
But Kelle is not on the rule-out list, is that right?
Those are the only official ruleouts per NamUs as of now, I’m afraid. I don’t know why Kelle isn’t on the list, but I remember the correspondence with detective Buse very well (and give yourself some credit, Laughing! It was you who emailed him! :D)
 
  • #210
Those are the only official ruleouts per NamUs as of now, I’m afraid. I don’t know why Kelle isn’t on the list, but I remember the correspondence with detective Buse very well (and give yourself some credit, Laughing! It was you who emailed him! :D)
They only list manual ruleouts.
Automatic ruleouts aren't listed in NamUs. It's supposed to be a given that if both MP & UP have matching identifiers in AFIS/NCIC/CODIS, and they're not listed, that they were found not to be a match. Because there are so many MP/UP cases, NamUs said it would nearly impossible to list every ruleout for each case.
I have seen a few exceptions, but I think they will update an auto ruleout to keep people from bombarding them with the same potential matches over and over.
 
  • #211
Those are the only official ruleouts per NamUs as of now, I’m afraid. I don’t know why Kelle isn’t on the list, but I remember the correspondence with detective Buse very well (and give yourself some credit, Laughing! It was you who emailed him! :D)

I did? Well, then, um, thanks for reminding me!

I few of these folks -- I can't seem to let go of? Every slight woman with light brown hair is Kelle, every tall, dark haired man looks like Bennett Wall:


Anybody else, well, is Not-Paul Raymond Harrod!


In case you are looking for another rabbit hole, fellow posters, here are a couple for you!
 
  • #212
Vidor Jane Doe at the Texas Department of Public Safety:
 
  • #213
  • #214
Hey everyone. I have been heavily considering Sheyl Denise Taylor as a potential match for this Jane Doe. The Grimes County Jane Doe has also been heavily considered and police have got DNA for Sheryl to see if they match. I don't think that Doe is her but I do think the Vidor Jane Doe really could be.
OK - OK - Sheryl/Cheryl Denise Taylor, 12, Picher, July 1978 | Page 2 |  Websleuths
72UFTX.jpg

Now, the main factor here is that this Jane Doe had shorter hair than Sheryl. There are two possibilities here.
1. She cut he hair if she ran away after her disappearance.
2. Her hair was short when she disappeared.
I think that possibility 2 is the most likely explanation and the one piece of evidence for this is an unconfirmed yearbook photo of Sheryl from 1978 in Picher, the year after this one.
sheryl-taylor-1978-jpg.398876

This photo depicts Sheryl having short hair, like this Jane Doe. This puts the Vidor Jane Doe more likely to be Sheryl than the Grimes County Jane Doe IMO. Height also seems like an issue but I suspect that:
1. Sheryl's height is off.
2. The Doe's height is off.
On Vidor Jane Doe's profile, they say that they know the height is an estimate and may be a few inches off. Also, Sheryl's height seems very off for even a 12 year old. My guess would be that she is closer to 4'5 than 4'.
Vidor Jane Doe UP4574Sheryl Denise Taylor- Charley Proj.
SexFemaleFemale
RaceWhite/CaucasianWhite/Caucsaian
Age12 - 2012
DLC/DOD1983 - 1984July 20, 1978
Height4'10 - 5'24'
WeightUnknown60 pounds
Hair ColorBrownRed/Auburn
Eye ColorUnknownHazel
Distinctive FeaturesUnknownSupposed to wear a patch over one eye but often takes it off.
CircumstancesFound in field.Last seen in Picher, OK. Notably didn't like it there.
DistancePicher - Vidor553 miles (9hrs 17mins)
I feel that timing and location are the only problems here. I know hair color but I have seen hair color change slightly post-mortem in some cases. Here is Sheryl's thread:
 
  • #215
  • #216
Hey everyone. I have been heavily considering Sheyl Denise Taylor as a potential match for this Jane Doe. The Grimes County Jane Doe has also been heavily considered and police have got DNA for Sheryl to see if they match. I don't think that Doe is her but I do think the Vidor Jane Doe really could be.
OK - OK - Sheryl/Cheryl Denise Taylor, 12, Picher, July 1978 | Page 2 |  Websleuths
72UFTX.jpg

Now, the main factor here is that this Jane Doe had shorter hair than Sheryl. There are two possibilities here.
1. She cut he hair if she ran away after her disappearance.
2. Her hair was short when she disappeared.
I think that possibility 2 is the most likely explanation and the one piece of evidence for this is an unconfirmed yearbook photo of Sheryl from 1978 in Picher, the year after this one.
sheryl-taylor-1978-jpg.398876

This photo depicts Sheryl having short hair, like this Jane Doe. This puts the Vidor Jane Doe more likely to be Sheryl than the Grimes County Jane Doe IMO. Height also seems like an issue but I suspect that:
1. Sheryl's height is off.
2. The Doe's height is off.
On Vidor Jane Doe's profile, they say that they know the height is an estimate and may be a few inches off. Also, Sheryl's height seems very off for even a 12 year old. My guess would be that she is closer to 4'5 than 4'.
Vidor Jane Doe UP4574Sheryl Denise Taylor- Charley Proj.
SexFemaleFemale
RaceWhite/CaucasianWhite/Caucsaian
Age12 - 2012
DLC/DOD1983 - 1984July 20, 1978
Height4'10 - 5'24'
WeightUnknown60 pounds
Hair ColorBrownRed/Auburn
Eye ColorUnknownHazel
Distinctive FeaturesUnknownSupposed to wear a patch over one eye but often takes it off.
CircumstancesFound in field.Last seen in Picher, OK. Notably didn't like it there.
DistancePicher - Vidor553 miles (9hrs 17mins)
I feel that timing and location are the only problems here. I know hair color but I have seen hair color change slightly post-mortem in some cases. Here is Sheryl's thread:
This could be a good match, Vidor Jane Doe died around 1983 and The Charley Project mentions that Sheryl Taylor "possibly ran away from home" so she may have been alive for 5 years and in 1983 she may have been murdered ( Sheryl would have been approximately 17 years old in 1983).
 
  • #217
It's supposed to be a given that if both MP & UP have matching identifiers in AFIS/NCIC/CODIS, and they're not listed, that they were found not to be a match.
As far as I know only DNA auto matches, but BOTH cases would need to have the same type of DNA. Afaik the Unidentified Index in CODIS only allows for the entry of Nuclear DNA, so they would have to have nuclear DNA on file for the missing person in order for it to match.
 
  • #218
Vidor is roughly 2 hours from The Woodlands:
Hello!!!!!! Othram?????
 
  • #219
As far as I know only DNA auto matches, but BOTH cases would need to have the same type of DNA. Afaik the Unidentified Index in CODIS only allows for the entry of Nuclear DNA, so they would have to have nuclear DNA on file for the missing person in order for it to match.
I'm not sure, but I thought they also used mtDNA for those samples that are too degraded. I know the Allenstown victims only had mitochondrial because theirs was so degraded. The AG said they couldn't compare it to the criminal profiles in CODIS to look for a paternal match because the protocol was different. Before Marlyse and her daughters were ID'd, they couldn't even compare Marlyse's DNA to Rasmussen's, hers was so degraded.
 
  • #220
I'm not sure, but I thought they also used mtDNA for those samples that are too degraded
I emailed someone at NamUs, if they do allow mtDNA I will inquire about how the auto matchup works with cases with mtDNA, Considering mtDNA isn't 100 percent unique
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
150
Guests online
1,082
Total visitors
1,232

Forum statistics

Threads
632,444
Messages
18,626,628
Members
243,152
Latest member
almost_amber
Back
Top