I finished reading after I posted the link and yes, sounds really extreme behaviour there. I'm not actually sure why this is even in court, given it seems fairly agreed how bad his psychotic condition was - I suppose to just figure out the line between manslaughter via diminished responsibility and not guilty via insanity? Would've made more sense to reach some sensible agreement on it and not traumatise 12 jurors IMO.
Today's link: Live updates from fourth day of Christmas Common 'murder' trial - not entierely sure I even want to read it after the previous ones...
Definitely not nice reading I am in 2 minds I was hoping to be on the jury then I was not chosen, to see the videos of him at the point of arrest then in hospital would have been quite horiffic I would of thought. It's going to court because he pleaded "not guilty to committing whilst insane" ???? Is that correct. It's strange how this has not been covered by the local TV channels. Maybe tomorrow it will be all done and dusted.
Last edited: