UK - Prince Andrew accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2

New Posts

  • #1,041
  • #1,042
Surely there will be a lot more to come on Andrew, apart from his subsidised existence, his years as "trade ambassador" for the UK and investigation into his personal profits vis a vis accountancy showing what deals he made and any percentage gained in the process, by him, his ex-wife and his daughters.

A dirty can of worms which will have to be opened up to investigation if the Royal Family is to have any credibility.

With the Epstein scandal, he and ex- wife just exposed themselves further.

IMO
 
  • #1,043
Seni said:
Surely there will be a lot more to come on Andrew, apart from his subsidised existence, his years as "trade ambassador" for the UK and investigation into his personal profits vis a vis accountancy showing what deals he made and any percentage gained in the process, by him, his ex-wife and his daughters.

A dirty can of worms which will have to be opened up to investigation if the Royal Family is to have any credibility.

With the Epstein scandal, he and ex- wife just exposed themselves further.

IMO
Click to expand...

I agree. He should quietly take what is offered and have gratitude. After all, Fergie is not in a position to ask for a house. She got her divorce check years ago. No "double dipping".
 
  • #1,044
There’s lots of room at Kensington Palace.

Give PA Frogmore and send SF to an apartment in KP or to Harry’s ex cottage.

Part of the agreement must be no interviews or writings (books or otherwise) about the RF.
 
  • #1,045
JDG said:
There’s lots of room at Kensington Palace.

Give PA Frogmore and send SF to an apartment in KP or to Harry’s ex cottage.

Part of the agreement must be no interviews or writings (books or otherwise) about the RF.
Click to expand...

Harry's ex cottage is Frogmore Cottage, no? 🤔
As per my earlier post with links.

Is SF a part of RFamily?
I'm confused about her status.

But then,
I come from a country which is a Republic.
So I'm not an expert on Royalty and its laws :D
 
  • #1,046
Dotta said:
Harry's ex cottage is Frogmore Cottage, no? 🤔
As per my earlier post with links.

Is SF a part of RFamily?
I'm confused about her status.

But then,
I come from a country which is a Republic.
So I'm not an expert on Royalty :D
Click to expand...

I was referring to Harry’s cottage at KP.

Nottingham Cottage

Yes, Frogmore was their (5 bedroom) marriage home, given to them by the late Queen. Not a cottage.

Officially, SF is no longer part of the RF but she is in that she is the mother of two princesses. Confusing…..but clear as well.

Keeping her close is one method of protecting the Monarchy.

SF has knowledge going back to her childhood as she grew up with the royals.
 
  • #1,047
I certainly hope SF is not frozen out when it comes to a home.

Yes, she has created problems in the past but she has no one other than Andrew and no where else to go.

In recent years she has battled two types of cancer, both breast cancer and skin cancer.

The King or his advisors need to take everything into consideration, her health and support systems that don’t seem to be there for her. IMO, MOO
 
  • #1,048
JDG said:
I certainly hope SF is not frozen out when it comes to a home.

Yes, she has created problems in the past but she has no one other than Andrew and no where else to go.

In recent years she has battled two types of cancer, both breast cancer and skin cancer.

The King or his advisors need to take everything into consideration, her health and support systems that don’t seem to be there for her. IMO, MOO
Click to expand...

Nowhere to go?
She recently sold her townhouse in Belgravia for millions.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Sarah Ferguson sells a Belgravia townhouse for £400,000 less than she paid for it

In another blow for the scandal-hit duchess, Sarah Ferguson has sold a Belgravia townhouse for £400,000 less than she paid for it.
uk.news.yahoo.com uk.news.yahoo.com

www.standard.co.uk

Sarah Ferguson loses £400,000 on sale of Belgravia townhouse

The Duchess of York said she ‘wasn’t looking to sell’ the property in central London, which she originally bought as an investment for her daughters Beatrice and Eugenie
www.standard.co.uk www.standard.co.uk
 
  • #1,049
I would say the danger is not so much what she may know about the rest of the family (or fabricate about them), but more the fact that she certainly knows everything about Andrew.

She has been generously - even extravagantly - provided for financially for 30 years at others’ expense. She has also had access to very large financial income in her own right through deals and book writing. She has been able to buy a £4m home 3 years ago and never live in it. She has family, friends and resources. She is not somebody who has been abandoned with nothing and nobody. Far from it.
 
  • #1,050
elliefant said:
I would say the danger is not so much what she may know about the rest of the family (or fabricate about them), but more the fact that she certainly knows everything about Andrew.

She has been generously - even extravagantly - provided for financially for 30 years at others’ expense. She has also had access to very large financial income in her own right through deals and book writing. She has been able to buy a £4m home 3 years ago and never live in it. She has family, friends and resources. She is not somebody who has been abandoned with nothing and nobody. Far from it.
Click to expand...
It is possible that she also knows the names of some of the other elite people who availed themselves of the services offered by Epstein and /or were involved in dodgy business deals.
 
  • #1,051
I don't think Sarah is going to end up in a shelter somewhere. Both of her daughters are married to very wealthy men in addition to Sarah's connections. She's gonna be just fine.

moo
 
  • #1,052
Yep.

No need to cry a river over her Fate.

We all make our fortunes.

There is this saying:

"As you make your bed,
so shall you lie in it." :D

JMhumbleO
 
  • #1,053
Last edited:
  • #1,054
  • #1,055
PA and SF really need to quietly move. They are such an embarrassment. Maybe Princess Anne can step in and help them see some sense.
 
  • #1,056
  • #1,057
Skigh said:
.

Sources today told the Daily Mail that Maitlis's claims were 'completely wrong'. Asked about the claims, Kensington Palace said a meeting - or indeed a conversation - between Prince William and his cousins simply never happened. 'This is not even a decision for him,' a source added.
Click to expand...

Who knows? 🤔

I don't think the public will ever know.
Everything is discussed behind closed doors.

But the fact is the duo is seemingly moving places.
And were forced to abandon their Royal titles in public.

And, interestingly,
it was pointed out that both daughters retain their titles.

In fact,
it was stated very forcefully.
At least IMO.

But,
what do I know?
I'm a simple commoner living in a different country :D

Just an observer.

I guess the journalists are better informed.
It is their job after all.
To be on top of things.

JMO
 
Last edited:
  • #1,058
  • #1,059
  • #1,060
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

zwiebel
  • Locked
UK - Prince Andrew accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999 - 2002
54 55 56
Replies
1,101
Views
96K
JerseyGirl
JerseyGirl

Guardians Monthly Goal

10 20 30 40 50
Our goal for the month is 50 new Guardians members to sign up. Have you been thinking about becoming a member? Click here to find out how!

Staff online

Members online

... and 143 more.
Total: 1,621 (members: 144, guests: 1,477)

Online statistics

Members online
144
Guests online
1,477
Total visitors
1,621
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
635,426
Messages
18,676,156
Members
243,224
Latest member
Noodles1
Back
Top