It's called scapegoating, and it's deplorable regardless of if it's done to "a hair trigger tempered, violent" or otherwise.
I agree, even if it's done to a satanic/occult following, black wearing, strange hair cut violent



It's called scapegoating, and it's deplorable regardless of if it's done to "a hair trigger tempered, violent" or otherwise.
However, this "alternative suspect" left biological evidence at the discovery site. IMO, that's a big difference - and justification for investigation, at least! As to "scapegoating," that's what happened to Damien, Jason and Jessie!
The convicted murderers also left the same kind of evidence and more of it.
http://wm3truth.com/physical-evidence-and-lack-thereof/
Investigators never found any slamdunk physical evidence tying Echols, Baldwin and Misskelley to the crime: no DNA at the crime scene, no bloody clothes, no murder knife.
Is that what you're referring to? If not, can you please list what you are talking about that is the same kind of evidence. I honestly did not see it.
They did find evidence that linked back the the 3 just like the same they did to anyone else including Terry Hobbs. I'm going to use Damien's analogy - 'it's different now than it was back then'. The testing they do today is much better and more accurate.
I think they collected 29 hairs from the crime scene. They also collected other physical evidence too.
On this one it says it's consistent with Echols hair
http://callahan.8k.com/images/crimelab/correct2.jpg
I am not sure if you've looked at the evidence reports and testing or not, but just in case you want to see more - go here.
http://callahan.8k.com/wm3/img/crimelab.html
There is information on the fiber evidence as well as knife and candle wax and other stuff too.
Has there been any testing on that hair to determine if it was, in fact, Echols' hair? If they have DNA consistent with any of the WM3, I'd absolutely be willing to reconsider my position.
ETA - Missed your last sentence when first responding. It is my understanding that the fiber evidence has been discredited. I'm not aware of anywhere where the wax was determined to be Echols' wax within a reasonable degree of certainty. The knife? I won't rehash thoughts on that, but I thought the reference was to evidence left at the scene and was curious as to what was found at the crime scene.
To avoid so much repetition, you might want to check out a thread that Kyleb was good to give us.
Hairs recovered from victims microscopically constant with Baldwin and Echols
Hairs recovered from victims microscopically constant with Baldwin and Echols - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
DAVIDSON: Your Honor, we'd also request a copy of the report of Lisa Sakevicius -- if there is one -- regarding any candle wax.
FOGLEMAN: I don't know if there is one. She said that what she puts in her report is when there are matches. She claimed that didn't match anything.
I appreciate that. It seems those hairs were confirmed to not have come from any of the WM3. So if the fibers are out, the hairs are out and the knife is out, what is left? The wax is the only thing arguably left by the WM3 at the crime scene?
What's interesting is that this actually does more to put Domini Teer at the crime scene, than anyone else. Seeing as the candle used for comparison came from her bedroom and all.
Interesting, how Domini keeps popping up like that.
ie when it was too late for the defense to challenge it.
Did you guys watch this video? All I can remember is "I wouldn't say I drink blood, uhm, I lick"
I used to do that all the time on the football field to try to psyche out the other team.
I used to do that all the time on the football field to try to psyche out the other team.
Did you guys watch this video? All I can remember is "I wouldn't say I drink blood, uhm, I lick"
Geraldo gives me the willies.