butwhatif?
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 3,598
- Reaction score
- 40
I'm a little confused here. Is this specifically about the contraceptive pill?
What about condoms? Which I don't believe would be covered by insurance in any country. (Please correct me if I'm wrong). So how is that any different from the pill not being covered?
Then there's the billings method for those in monogomous relationships who don't need to be concerned about STI's.
As I understand it, the Billings method has been given the green light by the catholic church, due to it being a completely natural method.....with a very high success rate.
It can be used for those trying to concieve, those trying to avoid conception, or to track cycles for women who are entering menopause.
In the world of science it has only been recognised in the last 50 years or so, but the method has been around for much longer.
http://www.drnorthrup.com/womenshealth/healthcenter/topic_details.php?topic_id=126
The beauty of it is in a women understanding her body's cues, and being in control of her own body.
I choose not to take the pill because my body doesn't like it. But my body doesn't even like it's own naturally produced hormones!!
To be clear, I'm not Catholic and on an anti-contraceptive crusade here. I am of no particular denomination and I believe women should be able to choose what contraceptive is right for them.
I just don't understand the people who claim to be of a certain faith, but pick and choose the bits they want to believe or practise.
I'm not critisizing them, I simply don't understand it.
JMO
What about condoms? Which I don't believe would be covered by insurance in any country. (Please correct me if I'm wrong). So how is that any different from the pill not being covered?
Then there's the billings method for those in monogomous relationships who don't need to be concerned about STI's.
As I understand it, the Billings method has been given the green light by the catholic church, due to it being a completely natural method.....with a very high success rate.
It can be used for those trying to concieve, those trying to avoid conception, or to track cycles for women who are entering menopause.
In the world of science it has only been recognised in the last 50 years or so, but the method has been around for much longer.
When it comes to birth control, women have a much better option than chemical contraceptives, devices, and sterilizationnatural fertility.
This approach was first practiced by the Aboriginal tribes. (This may explain why the largest organization, the World Organization of the Ovulation Method Billings [WOOMB] is located in Australia.) Its a timeless understanding of the female body that was handed down from mother to daughter in ancient times. As was the case in cultures that honored the feminine, women were taught to work consciously with their bodies. And this knowledge was passed on when girls started menstruating. Thankfully, these operating instructions for the female body are still available even though theyve effectively "been disappeared" from mainstream culture to be replaced by beliefs that the female body is unpredictable and unreliable.
http://www.drnorthrup.com/womenshealth/healthcenter/topic_details.php?topic_id=126
The beauty of it is in a women understanding her body's cues, and being in control of her own body.
I choose not to take the pill because my body doesn't like it. But my body doesn't even like it's own naturally produced hormones!!
To be clear, I'm not Catholic and on an anti-contraceptive crusade here. I am of no particular denomination and I believe women should be able to choose what contraceptive is right for them.
I just don't understand the people who claim to be of a certain faith, but pick and choose the bits they want to believe or practise.
I'm not critisizing them, I simply don't understand it.
JMO