Respectfully, it does happen. I'm a former bartender, and my son has been a bartender in Florida for many years. If someone is 86'd for breaking the bars rules, it gets around quickly so that other bars can be aware.
DittoThis is my thought on what happened as well.
I just saw about the text in an article. I have a hunch he was trying to swipe “got lost.”
If he crossed the bridge like it is being reported. He may not have drown. You sound so positive that he did drown when there is no proof that he did drown. That is only your opinion.
HOW do they know it had RILEY'S vomit on it?I haven’t heard any of this before now. So , reporting.
It’s on News Nation :Banfield
Now on News Nation, Banfield is reporting that a homeless man was wearing Riley’s shirt, two days after Riley disappeared. In fact the shirt had Riley’s vomit on it.
And the family saw him vomiting over the guard rail .
Banfield
Ashleigh Banfield is the definitive authority on the nation’s biggest true crime stories. A veteran award-winning journalist, Ashleigh brings a sharp focus to the crime stories gripping America, distilling facts and analyzing context in a way which captures viewers’ interests and imaginations...www.newsnationnow.com
Excellent post. My thoughts exactly. This should never have happened.
Yes, the fraternity should have stepped up. They didn’t.
Then there’s the bar. They didn’t step up either. And, I don’t want to hear that they had no culpability. They separated Riley from his friends. His fraternity friends were his ownly source of security and protection. They were a unit. That was the deal, they were a unit.
When the bar forced Riley out, he lost his protection. They sent him to his demise. The bar is at fault.100%. That’s JMO
Where does it say he crossed a bridge?? Can you provide a link?
Good question, same one I have! Which is why I also posted do they have the shirt and have they checked it for DNA.
im with you on that I had a bad concussion once and was puking within 10-15 minutes. He could also have sat down and aspirated on his own vomit
Well no, I can definitely see things getting around and people talking and sharing stories of those who are out breaking bar rules. But that night when they asked Riley to leave he crossed the street and was denied entry, I think it was because they could see he was obviously impaired, not because the bar across the street had already put a BOLO out on him. In my opinion..
The card situation bothers me, too. I think I read somewhere that it’s the only bank account his parents can’t access? (I understood this to mean after his disappearance, not before). Has anyone else heard that or did I misunderstand? Could it be a fake card? Were the women recording themselves searching when they found it or only afterwards?
Well said. I agree on both accounts, and hadn't thought about your second point (btw - I particularly enjoy your comments because you are very logical and do not dive into conspiracies based on no evidence).
It's very hard for me to take Ashleigh Banfield seriously. She isn't a serious journalist who sticks to the facts, she's a talking head that embellishes stories for audience ratings. She doesn't say a witness saw a shirt on a homeless man that appeared to be similar to RS's, she states the homeless man was wearing Riley's shirt. No body knows that for sure. If it truly is Riley's shirt and there was vomit it it was most likely Riley's from either too much booze or from a concussion and he took it off. If he removed his shirt and left it on a railing and his debit card was in the pocket then that might be where his card was found. It doesn't follow that a homeless person mugged him, took of his vomit laden shirt and stole his debit card.
Oh i didn't know..
Yes I just used that as an example of young drunk men doing inexplicable, dangerous things! I don’t think he was attacked by a snake!
Unfortunately, we don't know if that is the reason he was denied, or even the reason why he was kicked out in the first place. I was offering another possibility.
