It's my understanding that cell phones either have IMEI or MEID, depending on whether it's a Verizon or an AT&T phone.
In this affidavit, they talk about RL's phone being in or around his yard, and in or around the bridge. Were they using different phone data than the data being argued between the D and P now? Because how did the FBI place him within such close proximity? I'm asking seriously, because I don't understand all the technology.According to the FBI affidavit for RL posted by Murder Sheet, maybe RL. But why wouldn’t the defense name him in the 3rd Frank’s motion if RL was one of them?
If one was EF, surely they would name him, since they named him already in the Frank’s memo?
It wasn’t a phone of RA’s, according to page 2 of the 3rd Franks.
View attachment 495170
Source: 3rd Franks Memo, page 2
Third Franks Notice & Request For Franks Hearing
drive.google.com
I guess I will always wonder why RL felt the need to fabricate an alibi before the bodies were found, specifically for the time the girls were murdered.
If that doesn’t tell you all you want to know about the Defense then nothing will.
This is what I don’t understand. The D references geofencing, the P mentions both. They are different. You’d need a subpoena for both. You’d need a report for each. So which one are they talking about in their motions? Is one or the other (D or P) confusing the terms? P specifically mentions a geolocation assessment, and D had mentioned geofencing (in the latest motions). With RL, I can’t remember what is used to locate his phone (is it mentioned in the SWA?), but the FBI would be able to do either (with a warrant).
Thank you for this! Can’t edit or correct my post.
MOO Driving while suspended, he was ultimately given 4 years for it.
IMO an FOIA request could be made for the FBI interview and we would have the answer. All we have is the PCA and we know that info can be shaped toward the end product.
He also had guns which was a probation violation and he was weeks from his probation being over. I think he was trying to avoid jail time.
This section of the Indiana Supreme Court opinion addresses contempt issues.
How often did he have to strive his cousin for a nice alibi, when he had been underway with his (forbidden) car? He was always underway with it or another vehicle, as far as I remember, and he would have needed many false alibis, if it indeed were important to him.
Most of the time, the experts that a prosecution use are already paid by the state, so they aren't necessarily "cheaper." Some aren't, of course, but if you get in a situation where you cap cost, then you get the outcome that your expert quality goes down. If an expert can simply not be a witness, go to their regular day job, and make more money, why testify? Further, you can't force them to testify, as that would be an illegal restraint of the witness's liberty interest, so violative of the Constitution.
The MEID is basically useless, as the data resets every time you turn the phone off and it was 5 years before an arrest. But it has nothing to do with a burner phone. Burner phones are what drug dealers used 20 years ago so their customers didn't have their real number and they would trash it in a short amount of time. If you committed a murder that had anything to do with a burner phone, you would immediately trash the phone after the murder. Burning = trashing it. I can’t link urban dictionary here but you can search burner phone+urban dictionary in a search engine and it will bring up the definitions. JMO.
My point is, that he knew every trick in the book, IMO, and the police were generous with him and his lawbreaking, it seemed from the start. I don't think, he's responsible for the double-murder, but maybe he participated or he helped with some things. Idk! We can stop with this conversation. I first only said, his phone may have been one of the three within the geofence, nothing more. <modsnip - pesronalizing> Wasn't my intention at all to start a new investigation of RL here on WS.
My theory was speculation playing amateur profiler. Hands, feet, tree branches, using tree branches to go past the body form, are all extremities. How do we protect our extremities?
.
Wouldn't he also have been driving while suspended when he drove to the dump the same day? Yet he didn't ask anyone to lie for him on that trip - only the trip during the time of the murders.
