MaddyDecaf
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2007
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 0
DP date of birth: 01-05-54 KS date of birth: 06-13-63
reasonable age difference, considering their ages at the time
DP date of birth: 01-05-54 KS date of birth: 06-13-63
Why did DP write he wanted to be cremated and buried next to Kathleen? Why did he think Kathleen would die first and how much younger than DP was she? Is this premeditation? Let's pray the jury thinks so! If I were making that will with my husband, my burial wishes would be there too.
Just on fox with a lawyer explaining this will.
If it is handwritten, both eye witnesses have to be present from the first word put on the paper to the last.
The 2 witnesses have to watch her write the whole will in front of them.
Interesting. (Sorry, I haven't been reading the articles about the will) But didn't I read here that DrewP said he "wrote" what Kathleen dictated?
I do agree that anyone with children a business and any money to speak of would usually get an attorney to draft a will. There is also the fact that there was a blended family. Would a will be challenged?
By the time that Kathleen died, DrewP was remarried. Did he write another will with Stacy that listed another burial arrangement or did he leave it that he is to be buried next to Kathleen instead of Stacy?
Something smells about the will, and you said Drew wrote it?
Bet she made a will during the divorce proceedings and slimeball found it and destroyed it.
If you read reports, her signature is on it -- and the validity of her signature has not been disputed.
What now?
Really....ok, however will it stand up in court?
The other thing is, even if it didn't stand up in court, would Drew have gotten the same outcome of the assets????????
Really....ok, however will it stand up in court?
The other thing is, even if it didn't stand up in court, would Drew have gotten the same outcome of the assets????????
In the video I linked last night, Brodsky said that a will didn't need to be notarized. However, as we know, Brodsky went to the bar on the way to take the bar. So who knows?
From what we think we know, Drew had lock-picking tools and the skills to use them. Kathleen, I believe in one of her hand-written letters, stated that she found Drew in her house as she was bringing laundry down the stairs. If he murdered her on the night that we think (when Stacy supposedly couldn't reach him), then it's reasonable to assume he spent a lot of time in Kathleen's house.
Actually, he lived in that house during their marriage; it was THE marital house. Of course he knew the house inside-out. It seems like people have forgotten this fact and are trying make another 'something of nothing at all' regarding it.
Now, since Kathleen remembered to change the beneficiaries in her life insurance policy (the million dollar one), it seems unlikely that she wouldn't have changed her will. What if she made a new will and Drew was able to locate it during his "visits" to the house while she was still alive? On the night of her murder, it would have been very easy and certainly beneficial to him to destroy the new will.
What if she had NO assets to leave to anyone in a will, explaining why she had to opt for a life insurance policy? This is what people (who are worth nothing monetarily) do; they take out a huge life insurance policy so that their heirs and people they care about, will be left with something and so that their death will be the antithesis of burden upon those people. This is what Kathleen did. And yes, she did it in conjunction with her husband-at-the-time, DP. When they got divorced, she changed the beneficiaries of her life ins policy to be solely the children. This makes perfect sense to me. POINT? She never needed a will. The life insurance policy FAR exceeded any monetary assets she and DP had.
I watched the video and the guy has an answer for everything, but he doesn't fool me.
Who do you think he's trying to fool and for what purpose? I'm thinking the only question here is: Did he commit murder or not?
If she had a new will or a paper declaring the other will now invalid, you can bet Drew destroyed it or both of them.
Ugh. Blech. Phooey.
IMO.
Respectfully.
:crazy:
That will already stood up in court when KS died...... didn't it? The only thing being spectacularly blathered about in the media lately regarding it, is ..... that DP "benefitted" from her will. It's media hype -- and only because they have nothing else to blather about, in this missing persons case. THEIR children benefitted from it, as per KS' wishes. There's nothing to talk about. YET.
I think you're missing the key reason it stood up in court initially, and that is that Kathleen's death was originally ruled accidental. There didn't appear to be a reason to scrutinize the will.
It now looks as if her death is going to be ruled a homicide and if that's the case, then everything needs to be reexamined - ESPECIALLY a will in which her EX-HUSBAND is the key beneficiary....doesn't make sense. It would have made far more sense to take care of her children - like she did when she changed the million dollar life insurance beneficiary from Drew to her children. How likely is it that she changed one and not the other....ESPECIALLY since she told others and stated in her own writing that Drew (I'll paraphrase) wanted her dead.
In homicide investigations, they look for motive, means, and opportunity to key in on suspects. An ex-wife's estate valued at over $600,000 is certainly a motive. Drew also had the means and opportunity and those reasons are precisely why he being looked at. When you add all the other things in that have been discussed on this thread, it makes him the perfect PRIME SUSPECT.
Who - other than Drew Peterson - would benefit from killing a clean-living, divorced, suburban, accountant living alone raising her two children?
That will already stood up in court when KS died...... didn't it? The only thing being spectacularly blathered about in the media lately regarding it, is ..... that DP "benefitted" from her will. It's media hype -- and only because they have nothing else to blather about, in this missing persons case. THEIR children benefitted from it, as per KS' wishes. There's nothing to talk about. YET.
omg, what a waste of time......
Apologies for posting my responses inside the quote box. I wanted to address each statement.
Regarding your post #395, I mean no disrespect, but
People aren't forgetting he lived in the house at all. But, if she had a new will made AFTER THEY DIVORCED, then he would need to find it.You're making up facts.
She had assets valued at over $600,000 that Drew inherited. That's very significant. It doesn't make any difference at all that she also had a million dollar policy. A woman who lost her philandering husband to a teenager wouldn't want him to receive her $600,000 estate - try common sense. If she thought her children wouldn't need it, how about her siblings? I assure you, ANYBODY BUT DREW!
And who is Drew trying to fool? Everybody, especially the police, and for obvious reasons.