poco
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2003
- Messages
- 38,946
- Reaction score
- 243
Let's take a step back for a moment.
In the beginning, the first day after the shooting, local LE indicated they had a suspect.
Then, the state LE stepped in and stated, no, we really don't have a suspect.
We later learn that several people passed lie detector tests.
They sound like suspects to me, at least until their story was verified.
Then, we hear there is a POI and a separate witness who saw the girls only moments before they were shot.
They state that the POI is just that, nothing more, but we suspect this person is a suspect.
They have played with what they have released to the public from the beginning. Why?
I think they did have a suspect, but that suspect was able to pass the lie detector test, but they still don't believe it. They think it was two shooters, and other items in the news indicate that LE may believe that a group of people, may have even been party of the "shooting" party, but they didn't actually do the shooting.
That's why I think LE hasn't released the 911 tapes. They want to verify something with the POI, a time, a something.
I think they have about 95% proof of a suspect, but that 5% missing (an ID, a car description, a something) is a vital 5% missing that turns a circumstantial case into a beyond reasonable doubt case.
or suspect(s).................