There s nothing to indicate PTSD. She is the criminal, not the victim.
She told 16 different versions of the story. That is not amnesia. She remembered details days later, weeks, months.
She told her "story" on the stand. Only when details of the "stranger" and all of the inconsistencies in her "story" surfaced on cross is when "she could not remember. She recalls "fabricated" details that have no basis in reality.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Dissociative Amnesia - formerly Psychogenic Amnesia, is a pervasive loss of memory of significant personal information. This disorder is characterized by a blocking out of critical personal information. Dissociative amnesia, unlike other types of amnesia, does not result from other medical trauma, such as a blow to the head. The predominant disturbance is one or more episodes of inability to recall important personal information, usually of a traumatic or stressful nature, that is too extensive to be explained by ordinary forgetfulness.[/FONT]
Let me see 16 different versions of an event does not even come close to amnesia.
It is just too "lame" when the defense gets the whole story that casts their client in a "victim" state. But when the DA asks "they can't remember"
It is a hallmark, yet again of a guilty person. Even 6 months to a year after the event, Darlie was telling different stories to different people, Much different stories.......it all depended upon who her audience was.
Typical con.......con women and convict.
She told 16 different versions of the story. That is not amnesia. She remembered details days later, weeks, months.
She told her "story" on the stand. Only when details of the "stranger" and all of the inconsistencies in her "story" surfaced on cross is when "she could not remember. She recalls "fabricated" details that have no basis in reality.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Dissociative Amnesia - formerly Psychogenic Amnesia, is a pervasive loss of memory of significant personal information. This disorder is characterized by a blocking out of critical personal information. Dissociative amnesia, unlike other types of amnesia, does not result from other medical trauma, such as a blow to the head. The predominant disturbance is one or more episodes of inability to recall important personal information, usually of a traumatic or stressful nature, that is too extensive to be explained by ordinary forgetfulness.[/FONT]
Let me see 16 different versions of an event does not even come close to amnesia.
It is just too "lame" when the defense gets the whole story that casts their client in a "victim" state. But when the DA asks "they can't remember"
It is a hallmark, yet again of a guilty person. Even 6 months to a year after the event, Darlie was telling different stories to different people, Much different stories.......it all depended upon who her audience was.
Typical con.......con women and convict.