CuriousDad
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 74
- Reaction score
- 0
I think you need to view his deposition tape to answer this. Brad testified, in a sworn deposition, that the last time he saw nancy that morning, she was dressed in one of his tee shirts. He said, (on tape, you can listen and watch him), that he never saw her in any clothes than that tee shirt that day. He took Katie upstairs with him to surf the web, and nancy left the house. He said all he ever saw her in that morning was his white tee shirt. If you haven't viewed the tapes, you should. Most of the answers to questions being asked are NOT from prior to the 15th of July. Most of the answers to these questions are given by Brad, on Oct. 2, 2008. He had nearly three months to mull over his answers.
That's partially my point - people seem to be confusing his answers to questions and when they came, how he should react when is wife is murdered, when he doesn't even know that yet. Didn't know about the t shirt, but that doesn't change my point. He still would not describe what he had put on her, with 3 days to "mull over his answers". And if he did surf the internet, it will be on the computer. We've killed this spooked call, even though some are still holding out for more experts - DY said Cisco said its not possible. What more do you need??
Like I've said before, the Brad did crowd is getting nervous - call didn't work, just will have checking emails to confirm that she'd probably talked more with lawyers. The pros would never let the jury get nervous like that. They would have led off with the smoking gun, and then built the case around and up to that. Therefore, (I'll be as certain as some of you are), the smoking gun will more likely be a child's cap gun, leaving the jury with more holes to fill to connect the dots.