I'm going to say again, all the RTP techies have shown up for this case because the dude worked at Cisco and they lived in Cary... so therefore, their interested in the technical aspect. My guess is, the jury, um, not so much. My guess is the jury more than likely is a little more like me... blah, blah, blah, blah, blah blah blah blah when it comes to all this technical testimony. They're going to look at this first and foremost:
Brad's marriage was horrible. (due to the actions of both of them)
Brad had an affair with his wife's best friend, which in effect ended the marriage. (would have ended with or without this IMO)
Brad admitted this and was going to allow his wife to take his two children and go back to Canada UNTIL
Brad started snooping and being nosey in Nancy's email account and saw the separation agreement.(speculation)
Brad didn't like the $$$ cha-ching it was going to cost him to keep up his crummy wife and his two kids. (speculation)
Brad set out to make a plan - and changed Nancy's plans. (your opinion)
Brad decided it would be cheaper to keep his kids and do away with his wife. (your opinion)
Brad was an expert in some technological field that gave him just enough knowledge and ability to create himself an alibi. (anyone with a fax machine can program a call, would be easier to do it that way then complicate things)
Brad looked at and zoomed in on a map right over the spot his wife's dead body was found - and did it the day before his wife mysteriously went missing. (according to evidence which cannot be validated objectively or tested for authenticity)
Brad did not withdraw the allowance for Nancy that weekend. (means nothing, he could have been planning to do it Saturday)
Brad stated he was asleep and yet he was on the computer checking his wife's email (probably) lying in wait in the dark for her to arrive home from a cook-out (speculation).
Brad made a couple unusual trips to HT on the very morning his wife disappears and took two completely different routes. (has this ever happened before? you don't know)
Brad's wife went running in two shoes for the same foot. (no she didn't - one pair is missing, plus CPD says matching shoes for same foot 'not considered missing')
Brad's dead wife's running clothing was never found, except the sports bra that was rolled under as if it was being put on, not taken off. (too many ways to explain this)
Brad lost his shoes. (no, the CPD didn't remove them from the house when executing the SW- who said he lost them?)
Brad lost items from the foyer. (we have no idea why items may have been missing from the foyer, or what items were there)
Brad got down on his hands and knees and washed hardwood floors. (could be for any number of non-suspicious reasons)
Brad cleaned out part of a garage he hadn't cleaned in 8 years. (following exterminator visit, NC asked him to as one of her friends testified)
Brad cleaned his trunk to an immaculate state. (there was no forensic evidence found in the trunk, so he must have according to CPD)
Brad couldn't remember, couldn't find, finally found, and laundered the dress his dead wife had been wearing the night before that had what he and he only saw as a wine stain. (same dress the CPD walked right by several times after having it descibed to them)
Brad did not report his wife missing. (because he wasn't sure she was?)
Brad did not return a police officer's call even after he played the voicemail and knew it was a p.o. (so?)
Brad did not call his wife's family. (he asked someone to do it)
Brad showed no emotion other than being very tired. (so? maybe that's his personality)
Brad searched Air Canada and jobs in Canada while his wife was missing. (or BC pull up NC history out of curiousity)
Brad ended up with a diamond necklace in the drawer of his dresser that his dead wife never took off. (there was a concerted effort to promote the idea she never removed it - of course she did. Funny that if he's guilty he never took the time to get rid of it or hide it)
Brad is a confirmed liar. (as are quite a few witnesses in this case, its up to the jury to make their assessment of each)
Brad had the opportunity and motive for his wife to suddenly be dead. (that's speculation not fact)
Brad had a $75,000 life insurance policy on his wife. (they did these together, he never attempted to collect)
Brad Cooper was the only person to benefit from his wife's death (possibly, if he wanted her dead - but you don't know that),
the only person who did not care that his wife was suddenly missing and dead (and you know this how?),
the last person to see his wife (and you know this how?),
the ONLY person to say she called him that morning on his way to the store (and who else would say it?) ,
the person who never once inquired of the police how the investigation was going (why should he when he was a suspect from day 1?), what was going on, did you find the person yet.
And Brad Cooper was the one person who did not look the police in the eye and say, "I did not kill my wife," that they would have liked to have heard it from the most. (or he was rightly cautious with the police after being the only suspect from day 1)
.