I noticed that during one span of his redirect questioning of Investigator Gilbreath, Attorney O’Mara repeated the contention that his client had turned and was “walking towards his car” a total of SEVEN times in a matter of minutes. It’s clearly a part of the core of the defense strategy that’s now locked into the record and will be a point that will be driven to a jury.
Did it ever cross this attorney’s mind that a jury might wonder just exactly how far his client may have “followed” Trayvon before “turning back” towards his car?
Does this attorney not understand that GZ told LE that he had turned back towards his car at
[07:12:00 pm] after being told “We don’t need you to do that”?
O'MARA: And then he said he went back around and went towards his car, did he not? In his statement.
GILBREATH: In his statement after he was told not to by the dispatcher.
O'MARA: Got you.
Does he not comprehend that George Zimmerman shot Trayvon FIVE MINUTES later at
[07:16:41 pm] and was TWO HUNDRED AND THIRTY THREE FEET from his car?
Does this this attorney not understand that George Zimmerman got out of his vehicle at
[07:11:42 pm] and in his own statements to LE, says he only followed Trayvon for EIGHTEEN SECONDS?
IMO, once the jury wraps their minds around the fact that this “went back towards his car” after 18 seconds, clearly could not have happened, pictures that show up of an alleged little “boo boo” on George’s head, TWO MONTHS after the SFD EMT’s cleared him for transport in a matter of minutes, aren’t going to play a significant role in their verdict.
I think they will be able to readily see that George Zimmerman didn’t stand his ground, he CHASED it. They will see that his “ground” was an unarmed 17 year old kid who had broken no laws and was just trying to go home.
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7818390&postcount=69"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - 17 yo Trayvon Martin Shot to Death by Neighborhood Watch Captain #30[/ame]