I'm inclined to agree. On the other hand, a great deal of thinking went into manufacturing the explosives, planting them, and setting them up to detonate. And they are/were young men of the 21st century. We know the younger one was a regular user of social media. He understood its power, and used it when he tweeted the image of the "Terrorista" license plate. How could they not "think" that their images would be cast all over the globe? TT had been already questioned by the FBI. He was well aware they had him in their sites. How could he not "think" he'd be caught. Were they really just that foolish?
Another question that's stuck in my craw: what was the purpose of the marathon bombing? Was it intended to send a message? I suspect it was, but can anyone define it? I can't. No declaration. No manifesto. So they screwed up there, too, and I'm even more sickened by the senselessness of it all. Innocent people murdered and maimed, and for what? Absolutely nothing.
I think the purpose was to prove to the world what a big shot tamerlan was. I think he was a dissatisfied, disgruntled who felt entitled to much more recognition and status than he had.
The uncle said it best: Losers. Losers can become murderous when they are evil and believe they should have more without working for it.
What is the purpose of any terrorist act?
Usually there is a specific agenda. With 9/11 it was about U. S. aid to Israel and continued mIlitary presence in Saudi Arabia. Chechen rebels want to be separate from Russia. Basque separatists want to be separate from Spain.
I don't think there is any thing wrong or suspicious in their visiting their home countries. I just question the presumption that their circumstances were "dire" or impoverished. All MOO
You got that right. It's about a grand just for the tickets and Tamerlan was traveling back and forth quite a bit. I'm sick of hearing how "impoverished" these two baby killers were. It's untrue. And they were obscenely wealthy compared To the way they would have lived in the dump they came from.
Yes and most western converts ARE women because the Koran and Islam are very fair and attractive to females. Women received "equal rights" 1400 years ago whereas the West didn't catch up until the last century.
It varies widely depending on the culture, many Muslim majority countries have some VERY strong women, the women are often in charge of the household and even in charge of the finances.
Years ago I had an Afghan hairdresser, very very gracious woman that fled with her children and husband during the war with Russia. She told me that in Afghanistan the WOMEN controlled the household finances and before she was married her groom had his money transferred into her name.
Wait seriously? The Koran holds that a woman is worth less than a man and sometimes isn't worth anything at all, when it comes to testimony, depending on the crime or cause of action. There are other passages that have been interpreted as holding women below men, like the one about when it's okay to beat your wife.
And before I am accused of bashing Islam- I'm not. I think it is no better or worse in terms if violence or attitudes toward women than any of the other two, top monotheistic religions. But in the U.S. it is well known that the cultures interpreting Islam have a hideous track record of upholding equality for women or women's rights. And that's what is important because those are the cultures American, female converts become wedded to.
Let's be real. American women don't covert to Islam so they can be afforded
More rights than they already have or more equality. They do so primarily because they fall in live with some dude.
Not assuming,I have a question mark,just wondering. That's why I moved it to the PP. I think its worthy of discussion. Based on my own experience with my children,to encourage diversity, a lot of the foreign students are paying nothing or very small amounts. Meanwhile, US citizens are paying full price. Like I said,a better topic for the PP.
As for what I want to know about the consulate van,I just thought it was strange that it was not being reported,but I guess it must be standard procedure. I have never had any dealings with embassys and stuff so I thought having a van pick you up was odd. I guess not.
This was a well researched topic after 9/11. Why do we allow so
Many foreigners into our universities? Because they essentially support the system since they pay way MORE than locals. No way does any foreign national pay less unless they are here on sports Or other scholarships:
"At public universities and colleges costs are subsidized for residents of the state by which the institution is funded - out-of-state students therefore pay higher tuition. Typically, international students are subject to an even higher rate if tuition at both public and private universities."
http://www.google.com/search?q=fore...=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari#itp=open7