deelytful1
*~a mere mortal~*
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2011
- Messages
- 2,927
- Reaction score
- 14
Shoot, the guy could have watched it at home just like us. so what difference does it make? imo
LOL.. that's so true! Never even thought of that..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shoot, the guy could have watched it at home just like us. so what difference does it make? imo
The bolded by me is incorrect.
According to the walk through with LE the day after the shooting Zimmerman says that he did in fact continue walking to the next street over to find an address to give to the dispatcher after being told "we don't need you to do that." Zimmerman continued walking, he did not stand still, he did not "not move anymore".
I am not sure that the jurors will see it as profiling. They may look at it through their own experiences as common sense. If there was a recent home invasion in the complex, and the cops believed the perps lived inside the complex, and they were young african american males, than it adds credence to GZ's suspicions and his fears for his own wife who is sometimes home alone. JMO
I agree in so far as it is not at the expense of the defendant or a fair trial.This judge has been very aware of making sure the jurors are being inconvenienced as little as possible, IMO. If I were to be on a jury, that's the type of judge I would want.
WHOA....what just happened...Law Man, security...followed Trayvon's family out the door!!
Shoot, the guy could have watched it at home just like us. so what difference does it make? imo
Does the defense team have a little stool to stand on when they approach the judge?
Just noticed two of them stepping up?????
IMO
I was taught that Ignorance of the Law is no excuse to break it....but the kind Judge Nelson, is being generous to a fault, to the Defense, again.Sigh IMO
I thought they caught the home invasion guys? Anyone know?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No one on the witness list was supposed to read or watch anything about the trial until after they were dismissed and released from sequestration.
At least we know from testimony that one was caught, released and then re-caught.I thought they caught the home invasion guys? Anyone know?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I thought they caught the home invasion guys? Anyone know?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No one on the witness list was supposed to read or watch anything about the trial until after they were dismissed and released from sequestration.
It's interesting to me how "very, very, very concerned" JN is about alleged violations of rule of sequestration by defense, but didn't seemed concerned at all about proven discovery violation by the state (re TM's deleted cell phone data).
Is that not typical?
IMHO