Search results

His Honor will not be pleased. IMO

The best part is that he can't say a word about it on TS or to the cameras, or he'll be violating the gag order AGAIN. It's got to be making him crazy. <modsnip: off topic> IMO

I seriously don't need to know the details :eek: Thanks, Judge! IMO

Apparently he's already deleted his post lol. I'd better get my errands done shortly, so that I can watch the play by play "tweets". Going to be an interesting day in court! IMO

This is going to be very interesting! IMO

I just want to grab those little ones and run as far and fast as I can. Thank heavens they're away from her now. IMO.

Something mentioned on CNN is that the judge can jail him after the trial is over. His honor has a few options available, IMO.

They still have a gag order hearing on Wednesday, don't they?

Fortunately, the jurors disagreed with you. She's a SA victim. There was no consent on her part. IMO.

Yep. I've thought that TA wanted to be the last face that VB saw, and the last voice that VB heard. IMO.

Looks like it's right by the new-ish Dollar General store. Do you know the street number? I wonder if I could go up to the court house and get the documents, or go to PCSD for the report. Interesting that it's so close by.

Any guesses on who is next up? Cohen? Daniels? There's not a whole lot of time left for today, so bringing a big witness up would be strange. IMO.

I'm actually very local, but have only lived in the Paulding area for less than ten years. Was the house on Pine Forest Road? I'm about to go down the rabbit hole and see if I know anyone who may be related. Dallas isn't that big, especially back then.

Breaking: Trump LOSES his bid for a new trial or a judgment overturning the more than $80 million verdict for E. Jean Carroll in the second trial.

NO REFUNDS!!

Thank you!

Nobody else is included in the gag order. Nobody else has come close to crossing the line in this case IMO. The judge's reasoning can be found here: https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/PeopleDJT-DecOrderExtrajudicial.pdf

Longer than that. Almost five years.

Exactly. During the pressers, the words "at this time" or something to that effect say a lot, IMO. If they aren't still investigating JS, they would say so. Again, IMO.

Respectfully, no, we don't know that. They weren't answering questions regarding JS, because, again, it's an open and ongoing investigation. They had SS on video toting Maddie's belongings and Maddie herself, and it still took a while to charge him. IMO.